Compliant Flow Path Structure for Constant Flow Rate Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flow rate control systems in liquid rocket projectiles are complex and unreliable, requiring multiple valves and regulators to maintain a constant flow rate, which complicates the system and reduces reliability and economic efficiency, especially during ground tests where simulating flight conditions is limited due to varying pressure and temperature.

Innovation Solution

A flow rate control device with a compliant structure that adjusts its cross-sectional area in response to fluid pressure, using a main plate, sub-plate, and expansion and contraction flow path to maintain a constant flow rate without additional manipulation, formed integrally for simplicity and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a regulator or multiple control valves are used to maintain constant flow rate, then flow rate control is achieved, but device complexity increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the flow rate control function from complex external control systems (regulators and multiple valves) and integrates it into a simple flow rate control device formed inside the pipe. The compliant structure with expansion and contraction flow path inherently controls flow rate through pressure-responsive geometric changes, eliminating the need for separate control components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow rate control device operates autonomously using the pressure of the fluid itself to drive the compliant structure's expansion and contraction. The structure automatically adjusts its geometry in response to pressure changes, maintaining constant flow rate without external control signals or additional energy input, making the system self-regulating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If traditional control systems are used, then flow rate can be controlled, but the system requires additional manipulation and complex components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the flow rate control function with the pipe structure itself by forming the control device inside the pipe. The main plate, sub-plate, and expansion and contraction flow path are integrated into a single unit that combines flow guidance and control functions, eliminating the need for separate control valves and regulators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The device operates automatically using the fluid's own pressure to drive the compliant structure. No external control manipulation is needed - the structure self-adjusts its geometry in response to pressure changes, maintaining constant flow rate through inherent pressure-responsive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If ground tests are performed without simulating flight conditions, then testing is simpler, but the test results do not accurately reflect real flight situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest accuracyVSAvoidtest system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliant structure changes its geometric parameters (cross-sectional area of flow path) in response to pressure changes. This allows the device to adapt to different operating conditions and maintain constant flow rate across varying pressures, enabling accurate simulation of flight conditions during ground tests without complex external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures a constant flow rate is maintained regardless of pressure changes, simplifying the system, increasing reliability, and closely simulating flight conditions during ground tests without the need for complex control systems.

Implementation Method 1

an expansion and contraction flow path having a shape of a column connecting the through hole and a circumference of the sub-plate to each other, discharging the fluid through a plurality of holes formed in a circular shape or a polygonal shape in a side surface thereof, and expanded and contracted by a pressure applied to the sub-plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11927974B2Flow rate control device with compliant structure
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 KOREA AEROSPACE RES INST
  • US11927974B2 patent drawing
  • US11927974B2 patent drawing
  • US11927974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The flow rate control device includes a main plate corresponding to an inner diameter and including a through hole which is formed at the center thereof and through which a fluid flows, a sub-plate corresponding to a size of the through hole, disposed in front of the main plate, and applied with a pressure of the flowing fluid, and an expansion and contraction flow path formed to connect the through hole and a circumference of the sub-plate to each other and expanded and contracted by the pressure applied to the sub-plate. The expansion and contraction flow path includes a plurality of holes which are formed in a side surface thereof and through which the flow flows, and has a cross-sectional area changed by the pressure to control a flow rate.