Component Authentication via Global Installation Counter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices face risks of component damage and failure due to frequent handling and installation, necessitating a method to monitor the number of installations and ensure the risk of damage remains within acceptable limits.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a global installation counter that tracks the number of times a component has been installed, allowing the electronic device to determine if the component is authorized for installation and if it has exceeded the permitted number of installations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If components are frequently replaced to maintain device functionality, then device adaptability and repairability are improved, but component reliability deteriorates due to increased risk of damage from handling and installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent replaceabilityVSAvoidcomponent reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by tracking component installation history before allowing replacement. The global installation counter records each installation event, and the system proactively prevents replacement when the threshold is approached, acting before damage can occur during handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the installation counter and communicating with both the component and replacement device. This feedback loop provides real-time information about component replacement history, enabling the system to make informed decisions about whether to permit further replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If component replacement is restricted to prevent damage, then component reliability is improved, but device productivity deteriorates due to limited repair options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent reliabilityVSAvoiddevice repairability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the replacement permission conditional rather than static. The ability to replace components dynamically changes based on the installation counter value - replacements are permitted when the counter is below the threshold and blocked when it exceeds the threshold, optimizing both reliability and repairability based on component history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a global installation counter is implemented to track component installations, then component reliability is improved by preventing excessive installations, but device complexity increases due to additional tracking mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The global installation counter serves multiple functions simultaneously: it tracks installation history, determines replacement eligibility, communicates with replacement devices, and enforces protection policies. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each function, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12242660B2Systems and methods for authenticating components on an electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 APPLE INC
  • US12242660B2 patent drawing
  • US12242660B2 patent drawing
  • US12242660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a method comprises determining, at an electronic device having a first component of a first component type, a unique identifier associated with the first component. In some examples, in accordance with a determination that the unique identifier does not match the expected identifier of the component of the first component type in the electronic device, determining that the first component associated with the unique identifier satisfies one or more eligibility criteria. In some examples, in accordance with the determination that the first component associated with the unique identifier satisfies the one or more eligibility criteria, authenticating an association of the first component with the electronic device, including updating an installation counter associated with the first component, and updating the expected identifier for the component of the first type based on the unique identifier of the first component.