Flight-by-Flight Aircraft Component Distress Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reliability monitoring systems for aircraft components, particularly in military applications, fail to provide accurate predictive and preemptive maintenance insights at the individual component level due to reliance on fleet-wide statistics, leading to sub-optimal part usage and operational readiness.

Innovation Solution

A physics-inspired neural network-based framework for flight-by-flight severity prediction that utilizes engine-specific data, including TAC/EFH ratio, engine serial number, and other parameters, to model individual component deterioration and provide precise maintenance recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fleet-wide statistical models are used for reliability monitoring, then data requirements are reduced and system complexity is lowered, but prediction accuracy at the individual component level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reliability monitoring system from fleet-wide to component-level predictions. It divides the monitoring approach into: (1) fleet-wide statistical models for general trends, and (2) individual component physics-based models for precise predictions. This segmentation allows each level to operate with appropriate complexity - simple statistical models for fleet overview and complex physics models for individual component accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional fleet-wide statistical aggregation to multi-dimensional component-level analysis by incorporating physics-based parameters (temperature, pressure, stress cycles, material properties) that add new dimensions to the prediction model. This dimensional expansion enables accurate individual component predictions without requiring complex fleet-wide data aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If parts are replaced early to ensure operational readiness, then reliability is improved, but component utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational readinessVSAvoidcomponent utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by providing advance component-level health predictions that enable planned maintenance scheduling. Instead of reactive replacement or overly conservative early replacement, the system predicts component deterioration trends and schedules maintenance just before predicted failure points, optimizing both reliability and utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the decision parameter from fixed replacement schedules to dynamic, condition-based predictions. By using physics-based models that track actual component degradation parameters (temperature exposure, stress cycles, pressure differentials), the system adjusts maintenance timing based on real component state rather than predetermined intervals, maximizing utilization while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If component-level predictive monitoring is implemented, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data requirements and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces physics-based models as intermediaries between raw sensor data and prediction outcomes. These models act as mediators that translate component operating conditions (temperature, pressure, flow rates) into meaningful degradation predictions using established physical relationships. This intermediary layer reduces the need for massive datasets by leveraging physics principles that inherently encode failure mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces data-intensive statistical learning approaches with physics-based computational models. Instead of requiring large datasets to train machine learning algorithms, the system uses fundamental physics equations (thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, material science) to directly compute component degradation, significantly reducing data requirements while maintaining or improving prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4614267A1Framework for flight-by-flight severity prediction for aircraft components
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP4614267A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4614267A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4614267A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

There are provided systems and methods for prognostic analytics of an asset. For example, there is provided a processor-implemented method for severity prediction for aircraft components. The method includes accessing time series flight-by-flight data relating to a component of an aircraft, the time series flight-by-flight data comprising performance data; determining, by a prediction model, an estimated degree of distress for the component based on the time series flight-by-flight data; determining a flight-by-flight severity prediction for the component based on the estimated degree of distress; and providing a preemptive recommendation for the component based on determined the flight-by-flight severity prediction.