Component Dosing Control for Precise Mixture Ratio Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for dosing components in mixtures lack precision, often resulting in deviations from the desired component ratio, especially with poorly flowing substances, leading to over-dosing or rejection of already weighed components.

Innovation Solution

A control device connected to scales and dosing systems adjusts the dosing of a target component and auxiliary substances to maintain precise ratios by dosing the target component to a target value and auxiliary components to lower target values, allowing for after-dosing adjustments based on actual weights and tolerance bands to ensure accurate mixing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If components are weighed to within given tolerances, then the weighing accuracy is improved, but the resulting ratio of components may still deviate from the nominal value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweighing accuracyVSAvoidcomponent ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control device receives actual weight values from the scales and uses this feedback to calculate the actual content of the target component. Based on this feedback, the system determines whether after-dosing is necessary to achieve the desired ratio, thereby resolving the contradiction between individual component accuracy and overall ratio precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary dosing of all components to within tolerances, then calculates the actual content before deciding whether after-dosing is needed. This preliminary action allows the system to assess the situation and apply corrections only when necessary, maintaining both efficiency and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If a component is rejected due to ratio deviation, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent ratioVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of directly rejecting components, the system introduces an intermediary calculation step that determines the actual content and compares it to the desired content. This intermediary assessment allows for selective after-dosing rather than blanket rejection, preserving productivity while ensuring precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the dosing parameters dynamically by determining new target values for after-dosing based on the calculated actual content. This parameter adjustment allows correction of ratio deviations without rejecting the originally dosed components, thereby maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the target component is dosed to the desired nominal value, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the auxiliary substances must be adjusted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget component dosingVSAvoiddosing control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control where the target values for auxiliary substances are adjusted based on the actual dosing results of the target component. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain precision while managing complexity through automated recalibration rather than fixed rigid controls

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12140468B2Method for dosing a target component
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 HUETTLIN GMBH
  • US12140468B2 patent drawing
  • US12140468B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for dosing a target component (20), wherein a dosing system (10) doses the target component (20) to a target value (Z20), which corresponds to a desired nominal value (S20soll), wherein an additional dosing system (12) doses at least one additional component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed, to a target value (Z21) of the component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed which is lower than a desired nominal value (S21soll) of the component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed, wherein an actual value (G20ist) of the target component (20) and at least one actual value (G21ist) of the component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed are then determined, a content (A) of the target component (20) then being calculated according to the actual value (G20ist) of the target component (20) and/or the actual value (G21ist) of the component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed and the content (A) being compared to a limit value (T) or tolerance band (T), at least the component (21, 22, 23) to be follow-on dosed being additionally dosed in the event of the limit value (T) or tolerance band (T) being exceeded.