Component Failure Tracking for Automated Process Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated industrial processes often overlook underperforming components, leading to unnoticed inefficiencies that can significantly impact output over time, as small discrepancies in performance may not immediately affect overall process visibility.

Innovation Solution

A method that tracks failed operations and their percentage for each component, triggering alerts based on specific criteria to minimize resource waste while ensuring underperforming components are addressed promptly, involving both automated and human intervention for remediation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used to track component performance, then the overall process performance is maintained, but individual underperforming components are overlooked and their impact on output accumulates over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance reliabilityVSAvoidinformation about underperforming components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring by tracking the trigger value for each component across multiple periods. When the trigger value meets or exceeds the threshold, an alert is generated, creating a closed-loop feedback mechanism that ensures underperforming components are detected and addressed, preventing information loss about component performance issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by establishing performance thresholds and monitoring mechanisms before problems accumulate. By proactively tracking trigger values and generating alerts when components deviate from expected performance, the system prevents the accumulation of undetected performance losses rather than reacting after significant output impact occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If alerts are triggered for every performance deviation, then all underperforming components are identified promptly, but resources are wasted on transient issues that do not significantly impact output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to identify underperforming componentsVSAvoidresources allocated to transient issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by adjusting the trigger value over time through incremental modifications. When performance deviations occur, the trigger value is adjusted dynamically rather than using fixed thresholds, allowing the system to adapt to transient variations while maintaining sensitivity to sustained performance issues, thus reducing false alerts for transient problems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by implementing a threshold-based alert mechanism that only triggers when performance deviations are significant enough to meet or exceed the threshold. This prevents excessive resource allocation to minor transient issues while ensuring that genuinely problematic components are identified and addressed in a timely manner

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple components are monitored individually, then each component's performance is tracked precisely, but the complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance measurementVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by implementing a standardized monitoring framework that applies the same trigger value tracking and alert mechanism to all components. This multi-functional approach allows precise individual component measurement while using a unified monitoring structure, preventing complexity multiplication that would result from implementing separate monitoring systems for each component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11069216B2Performance characterization for a component of an automated industrial process
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11069216B2 patent drawing
  • US11069216B2 patent drawing
  • US11069216B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are improvements for characterizing performance of a component in an automated industrial process. In one example, a method includes, for each period of a plurality of periods, at least until an alert is triggered, updating a count of failed operations attempted by the first component and a percentage of a count of total operations attempted by the first component represented by the count of failed operations. The method further includes decrementing a trigger value when the count of failed operations does not increase for the period and incrementing the trigger value when the count of failed operations increases for the period. Also, the method includes triggering the alert in response to the trigger value satisfying a trigger value criterion and either the count of failed operations satisfying a count criterion or the percentage satisfying a percentage criterion.