Electronic Component Authentication Using Fingerprint Challenge-Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing authentication methods for resource-constrained electronic components, such as field devices, are vulnerable to attacks and require complex challenge-response pairs, making them insecure against replay attacks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a challenge-response protocol with a unique fingerprint and authentication tags calculated via hash functions or MAC algorithms, ensuring secure authentication with minimal resource requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If digital signature methods are used to authenticate components, then authentication security is improved, but resource requirements on the components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidcomputing power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified authentication approach where the component stores a copy of the manufacturer's public key and performs local authentication by calculating a hash of the challenge-response pair. This eliminates the need for complex digital signature verification while maintaining security, as the heavy cryptographic operations are performed by the manufacturer during enrollment, not by the resource-constrained component during authentication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a challenge-response mechanism where temporary, single-use challenges are generated and verified. Each challenge is used only once and then discarded, preventing replay attacks. This approach provides strong authentication security without requiring the component to maintain complex cryptographic state or perform energy-intensive operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If PUFs with large challenge-response pairs are used, then authentication integrity is improved, but device complexity and data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication integrityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex cryptographic operations from the component and places them in the manufacturer's system. The component only performs simple local operations (generating a response and calculating a hash), while the manufacturer handles the complex challenge generation and verification. This extraction reduces component complexity while maintaining authentication integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a universal authentication mechanism based on challenge-response pairs that can be implemented across different component types without requiring component-specific cryptographic implementations. The manufacturer's enrollment system serves all components uniformly, simplifying the overall system architecture while ensuring consistent authentication integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If static fingerprints or serial numbers are used for identification, then ease of operation is improved, but security against attacks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification simplicityVSAvoidvulnerability to cloning attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static identification (fixed serial numbers or fingerprints) to dynamic challenge-response authentication. Instead of using a fixed identifier that can be copied, the system generates unique challenges for each authentication attempt and verifies component responses in real-time. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity while eliminating the vulnerability to cloning attacks, as each challenge-response pair is unique and cannot be reused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4675471A1Method and system for authenticating an electronic component produced by a manufacturer
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4675471A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4675471A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4675471A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and a system for authenticating an electronic component (KOMP) manufactured by a manufacturer, comprising the steps of: providing (S1; SA1; SB1) a unique identification (ID) and an associated individual fingerprint (FP) for a manufactured electronic component (KOMP), wherein the associated individual fingerprint (FP) provided for the manufactured component is integrated into the manufactured component (KOMP) in an integrity-protected and trust-protected manner and is stored in a database (DB-H) of the manufacturer as a reference fingerprint (Ref-FP).