Component Mounter Search Range Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the PP cycle of a component mounter, there is a challenge in improving the efficiency and precision of image processing for recognizing the supply state of components from a bulk feeder, especially when multiple components are picked up by multiple suction nozzles.

Innovation Solution

The component mounter is configured to target a predetermined search range based on the position and feature amount of a reference feature, improving the efficiency of search processing and preventing erroneous recognition of components by determining the candidate feature portions' belonging to the same component as the reference feature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image processing is performed on the entire supply area to recognize component positions, then recognition precision is improved, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the supply area into multiple search ranges, each centered on a reference feature portion. Instead of processing the entire supply area at once, the image processing is segmented into smaller regions, reducing the total processing time while maintaining recognition precision within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of reference feature portions before conducting detailed component recognition. By first locating reference features and then using them to define search ranges, the system prepares the processing framework in advance, avoiding redundant calculations and improving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the search range is expanded to cover the entire supply area, then component detection completeness is improved, but processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing strategies to different regions of the supply area. Reference feature portions receive special attention as they serve as anchors, while other areas are processed within constrained search ranges. This localized approach ensures detection completeness without uniformly applying complex processing to the entire area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Reference feature portions act as intermediaries between the camera image and the component positions. These reference features facilitate the transformation from image coordinates to component locations, simplifying the overall detection process while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If feature portions from different components are mistakenly identified as belonging to the same component, then recognition speed is improved, but recognition precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition speedVSAvoidrecognition precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses reference feature portions as feedback anchors to verify component boundaries. When identifying feature portions, the system continuously references the known positions of reference features to confirm whether detected features belong to the same component or a different one, preventing erroneous merges while maintaining efficient processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multiple suction nozzles pick up multiple components simultaneously, then mounting productivity is improved, but the complexity of tracking and managing component positions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting productivityVSAvoidtracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-component pickup process into individual component tracking within separate search ranges. Each component's feature portions are independently identified and tracked relative to its own search range defined by reference features, simplifying the management of multiple simultaneous pickups while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4110032B1Component mounter
Publication Date: 2025.06.11 FUJI CORP
  • EP4110032B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4110032B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4110032B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A component mounter includes a state recognition section configured to recognize a supply state of a component in a supply area based on a feature amount including at least one of a shape and an angle of each of multiple feature portions in image data on which image processing has been executed. The state recognition section determines whether one or more candidate feature portions included in a search range belong to an identical component together with a reference feature portion based on one of feature amounts of the candidate feature portion and a positional relationship between the reference feature portion and the candidate feature portion.