Component Testing Using Log Events for Black-Box Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing component testing methods face challenges in accurately evaluating 'when' conditions, particularly in 'black box' scenarios, leading to inefficient resource utilization and potential deployment of unreliable components.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing log events to configure and analyze application log data, enabling efficient validation of test conditions without knowledge of internal code structure, thereby conserving resources and improving testing accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional component testing methods are used in black box scenarios, then testing coverage may be achieved, but resource utilization becomes inefficient and testing accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent functionality reliabilityVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces log events as an intermediary mechanism between the component under test and the testing framework. These log events capture execution flow information without requiring internal code knowledge, enabling accurate validation of when conditions while maintaining testing efficiency. The log events serve as a mediator that bridges the gap between black box testing constraints and the need for precise condition validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive application log data is collected for testing, then testing accuracy improves, but processing, network, and memory resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest condition validation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the specific log events that are relevant to validating test conditions, rather than collecting and processing all application log data. By identifying and extracting only the necessary execution flow information related to when conditions, the system achieves accurate validation while minimizing resource consumption for data processing, storage, and transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If black box testing is performed without log event analysis, then internal code structure remains hidden, but testing accuracy for when conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode structure knowledge requirementVSAvoidwhen condition validation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where log events provide information about the component's execution flow back to the testing framework. This feedback enables the validation of when conditions by observing actual execution behavior through logs, achieving high measurement precision without requiring knowledge of internal code structure. The feedback loop closes the gap between black box constraints and validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250258745A1Component testing using log events
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250258745A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258745A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258745A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may obtain input data to a component of an application, the input data having a data type. The device may determine, based on the data type, one or more log events that are indicative of one or more test conditions for the component and the data type. The device may obtain, based on an execution of the component, a subset of application log data, from a set of application log data, that is associated with the one or more log events. The device may determine, using the subset of application log data, whether the one or more test conditions are validated. The device may perform one or more actions based on whether the one or more test conditions are validated.