Composite Sheet Actuator With Reversible Jamming Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current jamming actuators in soft robotics lack the ability to rapidly and reversibly switch their tensile modulus, and existing solutions face limitations such as slow switching times or negligible work done during jamming, which restricts their application in strain limiting layers for soft robots.

Innovation Solution

The development of an actuator comprising two sheets with misaligned high-aspect-ratio openings that can switch from a low-stiffness state to a high-stiffness state through mechanisms like pneumatic, magnetic, or adhesive jamming, allowing for rapid and reversible changes in stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional jamming actuators are used, then stiffness change is achieved, but switching time is slow and work done during jamming is negligible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidwork done during jamming
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is segmented into multiple discrete elements (sheets with openings) that can independently jam together. This segmentation allows rapid engagement of individual elements rather than requiring simultaneous jamming of a continuous structure, thereby increasing switching speed while maintaining effective work output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator transitions from a static jammed state to a dynamic reversible jamming process. The misaligned openings enable the structure to dynamically adjust its stiffness by controlling the engagement of individual sheet elements, allowing rapid switching between states with sufficient work output for strain limiting applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If sheets are stacked with misaligned openings for jamming, then stiffness increases up to 1000 times, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestiffnessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator uses thin sheet structures with patterned openings instead of bulky rigid components. These flexible sheets can be easily stacked and aligned, achieving high stiffness ratios through their geometric design rather than material properties or complex mechanisms, thereby maintaining structural simplicity while achieving up to 1000x stiffness increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator creates a composite structure by stacking multiple sheets with different opening patterns. This composite approach achieves high stiffness through the combined geometric interlocking of misaligned openings rather than requiring complex individual components, simplifying the overall structure while maximizing strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If rapid and reversible stiffness switching is implemented, then application in soft robots is enabled, but control mechanisms become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication rangeVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator structure itself provides the jamming mechanism through its geometric design. The misaligned openings automatically engage when sheets are pressed together, eliminating the need for external actuators or complex control mechanisms. This self-jamming capability enables rapid reversible stiffness switching while maintaining simple control, expanding applicability in soft robots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The actuator achieves a significant increase in stiffness, up to 1000 times, enabling efficient strain limiting and shape change in soft robots, with the ability to rapidly switch between states and maintain deformation, addressing the limitations of existing technologies.

Implementation Method 1

the first and second sheets are magnetically attractive to each other in the second state such that the first and second sheets are jammed together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

the first and second sheets are adhered together in the second state such that the first and second sheets are jammed together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

the sleeve enclosing the first and second sheets and connected to a vacuum; wherein the sleeve is under vacuum at the second state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum pressure: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS20220001530A1Composite actuator
Publication Date: 2022.01.06 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US20220001530A1 patent drawing
  • US20220001530A1 patent drawing
  • US20220001530A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An actuator is described, including a first sheet comprising a plurality of first openings,; and a second sheet comprising a plurality of second openings; wherein the first and second sheets are stacked together such that at least one of the first and second openings are misaligned; and the actuator is configured to move from a first state to a second state, wherein in the first state, out-of-plane motion of the first and second sheets is permitted; and in the second state, the first and second sheets as well as the misaligned first and second openings are jammed together to restrict the out-of-plane motion of the first and second sheets. Methods of actuating and making such actuator are also described.