Composite Adversarial Training for Neural Network Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

State-of-the-art neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where malicious data points can mislead the models, affecting applications such as biometric authentication and autonomous driving, and existing methods fail to effectively defend against these attacks.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method that uses a composite adversarial attack process to train neural networks by applying a series of adversarial perturbations with specific attack types, power values, and intervals, optimized through iterative gradient descent, to generate robust models capable of identifying and resisting adversarial perturbations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If adversarial perturbations are introduced to data samples, then the model's performance on benign data points is maintained, but the model becomes vulnerable to misclassification attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance on benign dataVSAvoidvulnerability to adversarial attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by performing adversarial training before deployment, where the model is pre-exposed to adversarial perturbations during training to learn defensive patterns. The training process generates adversarial examples and uses them to update model parameters, creating preliminary immunity against future attacks while maintaining benign data performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts harmful adversarial perturbations into beneficial training signals. Adversarial examples that would normally cause misclassification are used as training data with gradient-based optimization, transforming the harmful attack mechanism into a useful defense mechanism that improves model robustness against such attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple adversarial attack types are applied to data samples, then the coverage of attack scenarios is improved, but the complexity of the training process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of attack scenariosVSAvoidtraining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple adversarial attack types into a unified composite training framework. Different attack methods (e.g., FGSM, PGD, AutoAttack) are combined and applied sequentially or in parallel during training, allowing the model to learn against diverse attack patterns simultaneously while managing complexity through structured integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal adversarial training system that can handle multiple attack types through a common framework. The training pipeline is designed to accommodate various perturbation methods and attack scenarios using standardized interfaces and configurable parameters, enabling multi-functionality without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If composite adversarial attacks are performed during training, then the model's robustness against malicious data points is enhanced, but the training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel robustness against malicious dataVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary adversarial attacks during the training phase to preemptively strengthen the model's defenses. By conducting composite adversarial attacks and gradient updates before deployment, the model acquires robustness in advance, reducing the need for prolonged fine-tuning or retraining after deployment and thus managing overall time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12626143B2Composite adversarial attack model training for neural networks
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12626143B2 patent drawing
  • US12626143B2 patent drawing
  • US12626143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to systems, computer-readable media, and computer-implemented methods for neural network training. Some embodiments are directed to determining an attack order schedule for the data sample that includes a plurality of adversarial perturbation attacks associated with the data sample, and performing a composite adversarial attack process against the data set using the determined attack order schedule to generate a perturbed data sample for the data sample. Other embodiments may be disclosed or claimed.