Composite Aircraft Door Structure for Low-Weight Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft doors are traditionally made of metal due to stiffness requirements, which are costly and heavy, while composite materials are used for other components to reduce weight and cost.

Innovation Solution

A composite aircraft door design featuring an outer skin with attached outer blades and an inner skin with attached inner blades, both made of composite plastic material, arranged orthogonally to provide stiffness and ease of manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal materials are used for aircraft doors to ensure stiffness, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddoor weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite plastic materials (specifically thermoplastic composite materials) to manufacture the entire aircraft door structure, replacing traditional metal materials. The composite door structure comprises a composite frame with composite web parts and composite cover plates, achieving both weight reduction and maintained structural strength through the inherent properties of composite materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to composite plastic material, which has lower density and different mechanical properties. This parameter change enables weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity through optimized composite material selection and structural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If metal materials are used for aircraft doors to ensure stiffness, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite plastic materials that can be manufactured through molding processes, reducing the need for complex metal forming operations. The composite door structure integrates frame and cover plate manufacturing into streamlined processes, lowering overall manufacturing cost while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the manufacturing of the composite frame and composite cover plates into an integrated structure. The composite web parts of the frame connect the side beams and serve as mounting structures for cover plates, simplifying assembly and reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Weight of moving object

If composite materials are used for aircraft doors to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but structural stiffness becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor weightVSAvoidstructural stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thermoplastic composite materials which provide high strength-to-weight ratio. The composite structure is designed with optimized fiber orientation and layering to achieve sufficient stiffness while maintaining weight advantages over metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality enhancement through the composite frame structure where web parts are strategically positioned to provide stiffness where needed. The composite cover plates are attached to specific locations on the frame to reinforce areas subject to higher loads, optimizing stiffness distribution throughout the door structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If complex web structures are used in composite doors to ensure stiffness, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweb structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of the composite web parts with the composite frame structure. The web parts are integrated into the frame design, connecting side beams and serving as mounting structures for cover plates, thereby reducing the number of separate components and simplifying manufacturing while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite web parts perform multiple functions: they provide structural stiffness, connect side beams, and serve as mounting structures for composite cover plates. This multi-functionality reduces the overall complexity of the door structure by eliminating the need for separate mounting brackets and reinforcement elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4491505B1Composite aircraft door and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • EP4491505B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4491505B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP4491505B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a door (100) for an aircraft (1). The door comprises an outer skin (110), a plurality of outer blades (120, 130) extending from the outer skin (110) at a predefined angle, a plurality of inner blades (220, 230), and an inner skin (210) attached to the plurality of inner blades, wherein the inner skin comprises a plurality of sections, each extending at a predefined angle from one of the plurality of inner blades. The outer skin, the plurality of outer blades, the plurality of inner blades, and the inner skin are made from a composite plastic material, and each of the plurality of inner blades is attached to one of the plurality of outer blades.