Composite Aircraft Opening Reinforcement via Co-cured Perimetral Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In aircraft fuselage structures made of composite materials, large openings weaken the structure and require additional reinforcement, which increases weight and costs due to the need for multiple parts and labor-intensive assembly, whereas existing solutions involve frame-like structures with riveted joints and increased skin thickness.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcing structure comprising an integral one-piece perimetral element along the opening edge, paired longitudinal reinforcing elements with increased thickness, and transverse reinforcing elements that reproduce the primary structure's geometry, integrated through co-bonding or co-curing, eliminating the need for additional parts and joints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If frame-like structures with riveted joints and increased skin thickness are used to reinforce large openings, then structural strength is improved, but weight and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the reinforcement elements with the skin by co-bonding or co-curing them as an integrated composite structure. This eliminates separate riveted joints and multiple discrete parts, combining the skin and reinforcement into a unified structure that maintains strength while reducing weight and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials for the reinforcement structure, specifically co-bonding or co-curing composite reinforcement elements with the composite skin. This allows the reinforcement to be as lightweight as the skin itself while providing the necessary structural strength, unlike traditional metal reinforcement that would increase weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If frame-like structures with riveted joints are used to reinforce large openings, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing costs and assembly labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the reinforcement elements with the skin into a single integrated component manufactured through co-bonding or co-curing processes. This eliminates the need for separate assembly steps involving riveted joints, reducing both manufacturing complexity and labor requirements while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement elements are pre-positioned and integrated with the skin during the manufacturing process itself, rather than being added as separate assembly steps afterward. This preliminary integration simplifies manufacturing by combining operations and reducing the number of discrete steps required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple discrete parts and joints are used to reinforce openings, then structural coverage is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural coverageVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple discrete reinforcement parts into a single integrated reinforcement structure that is co-bonded or co-cured with the skin. This unified structure provides complete structural coverage around the opening while eliminating the complexity of assembling multiple separate components with riveted joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances structural efficiency and reduces costs by integrating reinforcement directly into the manufacturing process, optimizing weight and eliminating manual assembly complexities, while providing sufficient strength and buckling resistance for large openings.

Implementation Method 1

The perimetral reinforcing element along the edge of the opening (10) is obtained, integrated and as one piece, during the associated process for manufacture of the skin (2), by means of co-bonding or co-curing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCo-bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

by means of co-bonding or co-curing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCo-curing: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP2589531B1Internal structure of aircraft made of composite material
Publication Date: 2017.01.25 AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL
  • EP2589531B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2589531B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3a
  • EP2589531B1 patent drawingFigure 3b~3c

AI summary

Reinforcement structure (1) for an opening (10) in the primary structure of an aircraft, said structure comprising a skin (2), frame members (3) which are transverse with respect to the flying direction of the aircraft, and stringers (4) which are longitudinal with respect to the flying direction of the aircraft, said reinforcing structure (1) comprising: - a perimetral reinforcing element (5) situated along the edge of the opening (10) and reproducing the geometrical form thereof; - at least one pair of transverse reinforcing elements (6) arranged on both transverse sides of the opening (10); - at least one pair of longitudinal reinforcing elements (7) arranged on both longitudinal sides of the opening (10).