Automated Assembly Table for Composite Structure Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual fabrication of composite aircraft stringers is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to quality control issues due to the need for manual layering and assembly of materials, which limits efficiency and consistency.

Innovation Solution

A modular, automated structure assembly table with multiple devices for positioning, compacting, and rotating composite subassemblies, including flipper and flopper assemblies, to facilitate the automated assembly of composite structures like aircraft wing stringers, allowing for precise alignment and joining of subassemblies while accommodating variations in taper and ply thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual layering and assembly of composite materials is used, then flexibility in handling complex shapes is improved, but labor intensity and fabrication time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling complex shapesVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated cutting machine performs cutting operations autonomously based on digital designs, eliminating the need for manual cutting and positioning of each prepreg layer. The system self-regulates the cutting process, material feed, and layer placement, significantly reducing labor intensity while maintaining the ability to handle complex stringer geometries through computer-controlled operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual placement of prepreg layers on lay-up mandrels is used, then adaptability to various stringer configurations is improved, but manufacturing precision and quality control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to various stringer configurationsVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable tooling fixtures that can dynamically adapt to different stringer configurations and geometries. The cutting machine and positioning systems are computer-controlled and can be reprogrammed for various stringer types, maintaining versatility while ensuring consistent, precise alignment through automated guidance and control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If automated cutting and assembly equipment is introduced, then productivity and manufacturing precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated cutting machine and assembly system are designed as multi-functional units that can handle multiple operations including cutting, positioning, and monitoring of composite layer assembly. This consolidation of functions into integrated automated equipment improves productivity and precision while managing system complexity through unified control architectures and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If manual conformance of prepreg layers to mandrel contours is used, then ease of operation is improved, but time consumption and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of conformanceVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical operations of conforming prepreg layers to mandrel contours with automated mechanical systems. Computer-controlled positioning mechanisms and automated handling equipment perform the conformance operation, eliminating manual labor while maintaining the ability to achieve proper contour alignment, thereby reducing assembly time without sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7788784B2Method of assembling composite structure
Publication Date: 2010.09.07 THE BOEING CO
  • US7788784B2 patent drawing
  • US7788784B2 patent drawing
  • US7788784B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assembling a composite structure is disclosed. An illustrative embodiment of the method includes receiving and positioning at least two composite structure subassemblies on a structure assembly table by operation of at least one first device and at least one second device and compacting the at least two composite structure subassemblies into a composite structure by operation of a third device.