Composite Battery Electrode Particles for Filling Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lithium-ion secondary batteries face challenges in achieving high energy density and capacity retention due to large specific surface areas and aggregation of particles, which lead to decreased filling properties and discharging capacity.

Innovation Solution

The use of composite particles where first particles are coated with second particles, with a specific circularity and particle diameter ratio, to improve filling rates and prevent cracking, thereby enhancing discharging capacity and capacity retention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If primary particles with uniform particle size are used to improve filling properties, then filling properties are improved, but specific surface area increases and capacity retention decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling propertiesVSAvoidcapacity retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides particles into two size categories: primary particles (1-10 μm) for good filling properties and secondary particles (0.1-1 μm) for high specific surface area. By segmenting the particle size distribution rather than using uniform particles, the patent achieves both good filling properties and high capacity retention, resolving the technical contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different particle sizes to different functional requirements: larger primary particles (1-10 μm) are used where filling density is important, while smaller secondary particles (0.1-1 μm) are used where high specific surface area is needed for electrochemical performance. This local quality differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of both filling properties and capacity retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a grinding step is added for granulation to improve battery characteristics, then battery characteristics are improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery characteristicsVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary granulation during the synthesis process itself, rather than adding a separate grinding step after synthesis. By incorporating granulation into the formation process, the patent achieves good battery characteristics without the time loss of an additional processing step, thus maintaining high productivity while improving battery performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If fine particles are aggregated on the peripheries of core particles to increase energy density, then energy density is improved, but filling properties are not improved and discharging capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidfilling properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the particle size parameters to resolve this contradiction. By using primary particles of 1-10 μm with appropriate size distribution rather than smaller core particles, the patent achieves both high energy density (through optimized particle packing) and good filling properties. The specific parameter optimization allows simultaneous improvement of both parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If particle aggregates are used to improve filling properties, then filling properties are improved, but specific surface area increases and capacity retention decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling propertiesVSAvoidcapacity retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments particles into primary particles (1-10 μm) that form the aggregate structure for good filling properties, and secondary particles (0.1-1 μm) that provide high specific surface area. This segmentation allows the aggregate to have both good packing characteristics and sufficient surface area for high capacity retention, resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite particle structure combining primary particles and secondary particles with different size characteristics. This composite structure allows the aggregate to simultaneously achieve good filling properties (from the primary particle framework) and high capacity retention (from the secondary particle surface area), resolving the contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8980125B2Active material, battery, and method for manufacturing electrode
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US8980125B2 patent drawing
  • US8980125B2 patent drawing
  • US8980125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active material for a nonaqueous electrolyte secondary battery includes first particles and second particles provided to coat the first particles so as to be scattered on the surfaces of the first particles. The circularity of the first particles coated with the second particles is 0.800 to 0.950, and the ratio r1/r2 of the average particle diameter r1 of the second particles to the average particle diameter r2 of the first particles is 1/20 to 1/2.