Composite Beam Joint Wedge Locking for Complex Load Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reliably transferring complex loads such as axial, torsional, and bending loads at the beam joints of composite beams, particularly when joined with metal end pieces, is challenging due to the high tensile properties of composite materials.

Innovation Solution

A composite beam joint design featuring wedge-shaped inner and outer locking features is implemented, where the end piece has wedge-shaped inner locking features that project outward and are covered by corresponding wedge-shaped imprints in the composite tube, and an end cap with wedge-shaped outer locking features is secured to the composite tube, effectively distributing and reacting these loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If composite materials are used for beams to utilize high tensile properties, then weight is reduced and strength is improved, but reliably transferring complex loads at beam joints becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidload transfer reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into multiple wedge-shaped locking features (both inner and outer) distributed around the beam joint, with each feature independently contributing to load transfer. This segmentation allows complex loads to be distributed across multiple discrete load paths, improving reliability while maintaining the high strength of composite materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking features utilize asymmetric wedge shapes with specific angles and orientations that are optimized for transferring complex loads. The wedge geometry creates mechanical interlocking that is asymmetric in nature, with different load transfer characteristics for different loading directions, enabling reliable transfer of axial, torsional, and bending loads simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If wedge-shaped locking features are implemented to transfer complex loads, then load transfer capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidjoint structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inner and outer locking features are merged into a unified wedge-shaped geometry that performs multiple functions simultaneously. The same wedge structure provides both the locking action and the load transfer mechanism, eliminating the need for separate locking and load-bearing components, thus reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high load transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inner locking features are nested within the composite beam structure, while outer locking features are nested on the exterior. This nested arrangement allows the locking mechanism to be integrated within the existing beam geometry rather than adding external attachments, minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If composite tube is clamped against end piece to form wedge-shaped imprints, then load distribution is optimized, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distributionVSAvoidimprint formation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The wedge-shaped locking features are pre-formed on the end piece before the composite tube is applied. This preliminary action ensures that the imprints are formed with consistent geometry and orientation, reducing the precision requirements during the final assembly and curing process. The pre-formed wedges guide the composite material into the correct position and shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process utilizes changes in material parameters during curing - the composite tube material transitions from a moldable state to a cured state, allowing the wedge-shaped imprints to be formed with acceptable precision during the molding process and then locked in place upon curing, reducing the need for extremely tight tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11892030B2Composite beam joint with wedge-shaped inner and outer locking features
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 CROMPTON TECH GROUP
  • US11892030B2 patent drawing
  • US11892030B2 patent drawing
  • US11892030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a composite beam structure having: an end piece, an end piece outer periphery surface, and an end piece mating end defining an end piece axial boundary, the end piece includes wedge-shaped inner locking features that are formed to project outwardly from the end piece outer periphery surface at the end piece mating end and are spaced apart from one another in the hoop direction; and a composite tube configured to surround at least a portion of the end piece mating end to form a beam joint, wedge-shaped imprints are formed through the composite tube, corresponding to the wedge-shaped inner locking features, the wedge-shaped imprints define respective composite tube wedge-shaped depression surfaces about a composite tube inner periphery and composite tube wedge-shaped boss surfaces about a composite tube outer periphery, and the wedge-shaped inner locking features of the end piece are covered by the composite tube wedge-shaped depression surfaces.