Composite Vehicle Beams With Mixed Fiber Layout for Crash Resistance
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current vehicle structural components, despite using composite materials, do not fully leverage the weight-saving and safety benefits of these materials, particularly in absorbing kinetic energy during collisions and minimizing damage in low-speed impacts.
Innovation Solution
A vehicle component design featuring a first beam made of chopped fiber-reinforced thermoset resin and a second beam made of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite, with specific surface area ratios and orientations to enhance crash resistance and manufacturability, while reducing weight.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If chopped fiber-reinforced composite is used for the first beam, then the component can be manufactured using conventional SMC processes, but the strength and stiffness are insufficient compared to unidirectional fiber composites
Solution Approach 1:
The vehicle component is divided into two separate beams: a first beam made of chopped fiber-reinforced composite material and a second beam made of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite material. This segmentation allows each beam to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall manufacturability of the component assembly.
Solution Approach 2:
Different regions of the vehicle component use different fiber reinforcement types. The first beam uses chopped fibers for areas requiring ease of manufacture and complex shaping, while the second beam uses unidirectional fibers for areas requiring maximum strength and stiffness. This local quality approach optimizes the overall component performance.
2Strength
If unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite is used for the second beam, then the strength and stiffness are maximized, but the manufacturing complexity increases compared to chopped fiber composites
Solution Approach 1:
The vehicle component is divided into two separate beams: a first beam made of chopped fiber-reinforced composite material and a second beam made of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite material. This segmentation allows each beam to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall manufacturability of the component assembly.
Solution Approach 2:
Different regions of the vehicle component use different fiber reinforcement types. The first beam uses chopped fibers for areas requiring ease of manufacture and complex shaping, while the second beam uses unidirectional fibers for areas requiring maximum strength and stiffness. This local quality approach optimizes the overall component performance.
3Strength
If traditional metal structural components are used, then the strength and safety performance are ensured, but the vehicle weight increases reducing fuel efficiency
Solution Approach 1:
The vehicle component uses composite materials consisting of fiber reinforcements embedded in a resin matrix for both beams. These composite materials provide high strength-to-weight ratio, ensuring structural integrity while significantly reducing vehicle weight compared to traditional metal components, thereby improving fuel efficiency.
4Strength
If a single complex beam design is used, then the structural integrity is maintained, but the weight cannot be further reduced and manufacturing becomes more difficult
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of using a single complex beam, the invention divides the structure into two separate beams with different material compositions. This segmentation allows optimization of each beam's weight and manufacturing process while maintaining the overall structural integrity required for safety performance.
Data Source
Figure 1~3A
Figure 3B~3E
Figure 4~5
AI summary
A vehicle component includes a body, a first beam, and a second beam. The body has a first fixture region and a second fixture region. The first beam is formed of a first composite material and has a first beam shape. The first beam is attached to the body and extends between the first fixture region and the second fixture region of the body. The second beam is formed of a second composite material and has a second beam shape that is simple compared to the first beam shape. The second beam is attached to the body and extends between the first fixture region and the second fixture region of the body.