Composite Bone Grafts with Allograft Osteoinduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bone graft implants fail to provide reliable and consistent results due to issues such as rapid degradation, inadequate mechanical integrity, and improper porosity, leading to suboptimal bone tissue regeneration and clinical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

The development of porous, composite bone graft implants combining bioactive glass and allograft materials with tailored resorption capacities and pore size distributions, optimized for vascularization, cell attachment, and customized anatomical fit, providing structural and functional synergy for sustained tissue growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bone graft implants are designed with high porosity to allow vascularization and cell infiltration, then bone tissue regeneration is improved, but mechanical integrity and structural support deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone tissue regenerationVSAvoidmechanical integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite bone graft materials combining multiple components (e.g., calcium phosphates, collagen, growth factors) to achieve both high porosity for tissue regeneration and adequate mechanical strength. The composite structure allows different materials to contribute their strengths: porous frameworks enable cell infiltration while maintaining structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If bone graft implants are designed to degrade rapidly to make way for new tissue, then space for bone growth is provided, but structural support and mechanical integrity deteriorate before tissue maturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue formation rateVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs bone graft implants with dynamic, staged degradation profiles where the material degrades at controlled rates matching tissue formation. The implant maintains structural integrity during early loading phases then gradually degrades as new bone forms, providing temporal coordination between structural support and tissue regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary structural design where the implant provides adequate mechanical support before degradation begins. The scaffold is pre-engineered with optimal pore structures and material properties to support tissue formation initially, then progressively degrades as the new tissue matures and takes over load-bearing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If allograft materials are incorporated to provide osteoinduction and biological activity, then bone formation is enhanced, but risk of disease transmission and immunogenicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveosteoinductionVSAvoiddisease transmission risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the beneficial osteoinductive components from allograft materials while eliminating harmful elements. Techniques such as demineralization extract growth factors and osteoinductive proteins from bone matrix, removing potential pathogens while retaining biological activity. The extracted components are then incorporated into synthetic scaffolds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic bone graft materials as intermediaries that provide osteoinduction without direct allograft contact. Growth factors and osteoinductive proteins are isolated from allografts and incorporated into biocompatible synthetic carriers, mediating the biological effect while eliminating disease transmission risks associated with direct allograft use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If custom anatomical shapes are created to fit individual patients, then surgical fit and precision are improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical fitVSAvoidcustomization process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter-based customization where standard implant designs are modified by adjusting geometric parameters to match patient anatomy. Digital modeling allows precise control of pore size, shape, and distribution parameters while maintaining standardized manufacturing processes, achieving custom fit without proportionally increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10478528B2Bone graft implants containing allograft
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 PROSIDYAN INC
  • US10478528B2 patent drawing
  • US10478528B2 patent drawing
  • US10478528B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Synthetic, bioactive ultra-porous bone graft materials having an engineered porosity, and implants formed from such materials are provided. In particular, these implants comprise bioactive glass and incorporate allograft material for osteoinduction. The implants are suitable for bone tissue regeneration and/or repair.