Composite Bone Grafts Using Polymeric Binders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bone graft technologies do not effectively utilize bone particles or dust generated during processing, leading to waste and limiting the benefits of donor gifts, and often result in grafts with inconsistent mechanical properties and poor integration with natural bone.

Innovation Solution

A bone graft composition using human cadaveric bone material immobilized in a polymeric binder, such as polylactic acid or cyanoacrylate, which promotes cohesion and can be machined into desired shapes, with adjustable properties to match natural bone, and a method involving centrifugation or isostatic pressure to create a strong, flexible composite.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If bone particles are used as waste material without processing, then material utilization is poor, but creating structured grafts requires additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone particle wasteVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention recovers bone particles that would normally be discarded as waste during bone processing. These particles are collected and reprocessed into structured grafts, thereby reducing material loss and maximizing the utilization of donor bone tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The bone processing is segmented into distinct stages: initial bone preparation, particle collection, particle processing (demineralization, sizing), binder application, and final graft formation. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently while maintaining overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If bone particles are simply aggregated without binding, then manufacturing is simple, but mechanical strength and structural integrity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraft fabrication simplicityVSAvoidgraft mechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a composite material system combining bone particles with polymeric binders. The bone particles provide the structural framework and biological functionality, while the polymeric binder (such as polylactic acid or cyanoacrylate) provides mechanical strength and cohesion, resulting in a composite graft with both ease of manufacture and sufficient strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Loss of substance

If graft size is increased to maximize donor material utility, then material utilization improves, but implantation difficulty and integration challenges increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedonor bone utilizationVSAvoidimplantation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The final graft is segmented into smaller, manageable particles that can be easily implanted. These particles are then bound together in situ or pre-assembled into configurable structures, allowing maximum utilization of donor material while maintaining ease of implantation and integration with the patient's anatomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If consistent mechanical properties are achieved through processing, then graft reliability improves, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical property consistencyVSAvoidprocessing procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention controls key processing parameters such as particle size distribution, demineralization extent, binder concentration, and curing conditions to achieve consistent mechanical properties. By standardizing these parameters across processing batches, reliable and predictable graft performance is achieved while maintaining a manageable processing procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the creation of bone grafts with consistent mechanical properties similar to natural bone, allowing for effective implantation and integration, maximizing the utility of donor bone material and enhancing treatment outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

The polymeric binder may promote cohesion between bone material with or without forming a bond between the polymer and the bone material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

a method involving centrifugation or isostatic pressure to create a strong, flexible composite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

a method involving centrifugation or isostatic pressure to create a strong, flexible composite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIsostatic pressure: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS10617526B2Composite bone constructs and methods
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 ALLOSOURCE
  • US10617526B2 patent drawing
  • US10617526B2 patent drawing
  • US10617526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present technology include a method of making a bone composite graft for administration to a patient. The method may include combining a human cadaveric bone material with a plurality of polymethyl methacrylate binder particles and spincasting the combined human cadaveric bone material and polymethyl methacrylate binder particles to produce the bone composite graft. The method may also include ablating the bone composite graft to increase the surface area of bone material exposed. The human cadaveric bone material may be immobilized in the plurality of polymethyl methacrylate binder particles. The human cadaveric bone material may be present in an amount that is 50 weight percent of the bone composite graft, or less. Additionally, the bone composite graft may have a yield strength that is at least 13,000 N/cm2 and no greater than 15,000 N/cm2.