Composite Compression Limiter for Vehicle Sub-Frame Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional metal sub-frames and compression limiters in vehicles are heavy, expensive, and contribute to reduced fuel economy due to their weight, while also facing challenges in meeting structural and impact strength requirements.

Innovation Solution

A composite thermoplastic structure and compression limiter made from polymeric continuous fiber tape reinforced with fibers, such as carbon or glass, which reduces weight and enhances stiffness and impact resistance, eliminating galvanic corrosion and improving creep performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal materials (steel) are used for sub-frame components, then sufficient stiffness and impact strength are achieved, but weight increases and fuel economy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact strengthVSAvoidsub-frame weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by replacing traditional metal sub-frame components with thermoplastic composite parts reinforced with continuous fibers (20-65% by weight). This composite construction maintains sufficient stiffness and impact strength while significantly reducing weight compared to steel components, directly resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If metal compression limiters are used to prevent creep of thermoplastic parts, then creep resistance is improved, but substantial additional weight is added to the vehicle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreep resistanceVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by replacing metal compression limiters with thermoplastic composite limiters that have comparable mechanical properties. The composite limiters maintain sufficient compressive strength and creep resistance while being significantly lighter than metal alternatives, resolving the contradiction between reliability and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple metal compression limiters are used throughout the vehicle, then structural requirements are met, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural requirementsVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of compression limiters into the thermoplastic sub-frame components themselves through integrated design. The thermoplastic parts incorporate built-in creep resistance features and load distribution structures, eliminating the need for separate metal compression limiters and reducing assembly complexity while maintaining structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10518819B2Composite thermoplastic structure and composite compression limiter for same
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 BASF SE
  • US10518819B2 patent drawing
  • US10518819B2 patent drawing
  • US10518819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite compression limiter (44) includes a cylindrical body (46) extending axially with an aperture (48) extending axially therethrough to receive a fastener (18), the body (46) being made of a continuous fiber polymeric tape reinforced by a plurality of fibers ranging from approximately 20% to approximately 65% by weight.