Composite Core with Adhesively Bonded Tubes
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional composite sandwich structures have limitations due to the mechanical strength of their cores, particularly in applications where load concentration and tailored stiffness are required, as existing honeycomb cores either increase weight without proportional load-carrying capability or suffer from uneven stiffness and strength, residual stresses, and manufacturing challenges.
Innovation Solution
A composite core comprising a plurality of tubes with fibers wound in a candy stripe pattern, where adjacent tubes are adhesively bonded, allowing for varied winding angles to optimize shear and compression strength, and featuring a porous core with small holes to reduce material usage and enhance structural integrity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Weight of moving object
If conventional honeycomb cores are used to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but mechanical strength and load-carrying capability are insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses composite materials by embedding discrete fibers (such as carbon, glass, or aramid fibers) within the core material matrix. This creates a composite core structure that combines the light weight of the base core material with the high strength of the embedded fibers, thereby improving mechanical strength without significantly increasing weight.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.
2Strength
If core weight is increased to improve load-carrying capability, then load-carrying capability is improved, but weight increases without proportional benefit
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameters of the core structure by varying fiber orientation angles, fiber density, and fiber type in different regions of the core. This allows optimization of load-carrying capability in specific directions and regions, achieving higher strength-to-weight ratio by matching material properties to local stress states rather than using a uniform heavy construction.
3Strength
If stacked ribbon blocks are used to increase wall thickness, then weight increases by approximately 30%, but load-carrying capability does not increase proportionally
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses composite materials by embedding discrete fibers (such as carbon, glass, or aramid fibers) within the core material matrix. This creates a composite core structure that combines the light weight of the base core material with the high strength of the embedded fibers, thereby improving mechanical strength without significantly increasing weight.
4Ease of manufacture
If ribbons are stacked to form core blocks, then manufacturing is simplified, but uneven stiffness and strength in different directions occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by varying fiber orientation and density in different regions of the core to achieve uniform overall properties. By strategically placing fibers at specific angles and concentrations in different cell walls and nodes, the design compensates for the directional bias introduced by ribbon stacking, creating a more isotropic structural response.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses asymmetry by intentionally varying fiber orientation angles and densities in different regions of the core to counterbalance the inherent asymmetry of stacked ribbons. This asymmetric reinforcement strategy ensures that stiffness and strength are more evenly distributed across different directions, overcoming the directional weakness of the ribbon stacking approach.
5Adaptability or versatility
If unbalanced or unsymmetrical layup is used in ribbons, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but ribbon distortion and twisting occur after cure
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes parameters by carefully controlling fiber orientation angles, tow spacing, and resin content during the layup process. By optimizing these parameters, the design achieves the desired flexibility and tailoring capability while maintaining dimensional stability and preventing distortion during curing.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the fiber reinforcement pattern and properties before final assembly and curing. This includes pre-tensioning fibers, pre-positioning reinforcement layers, and pre-establishing proper layup sequences to prevent distortion and ensure dimensional accuracy before the structure is locked in place during curing.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The solution provides improved mechanical strength, reduced weight, and tailored stiffness in composite sandwich structures, addressing the limitations of conventional cores by enhancing load-carrying capacity and manufacturing ease while minimizing material usage and residual stresses.
Implementation Method 1
each of the plurality of tubes comprising a single tow or split tow of fibers wound in a single candy stripe pattern
Implementation Method 2
Adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes are adhesively bonded, or infused, to one another along sides of the adjacent tubes
Implementation Method 3
A resin is introduced into the preform by a number of means, including vacuum assisted resin transfer molding
Implementation Method 4
featuring a porous core with small holes to reduce material usage and enhance structural integrity
Data Source
AI summary
A composite core includes a plurality of tubes, each the plurality of tubes comprising a plurality of fibers disposed in a polymeric matrix. Adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes are adhesively bonded to one another along sides of the adjacent tubes. A method of making a composite core includes the steps of providing a plurality of tubes, each of the plurality of tubes including a plurality of fibers disposed in a polymeric matrix, and adhesively bonding adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes along sides of the adjacent tubes. A method of making a composite core such that a removable band is included in the core, the removable band being configured to be removable through a procedure subsequent to the cure of the composite core, thereby producing gaps in the core.


