Composite Core with Adhesively Bonded Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional composite sandwich structures have limitations due to the mechanical strength of their cores, particularly in applications where load concentration and tailored stiffness are required, as existing honeycomb cores either increase weight without proportional load-carrying capability or suffer from uneven stiffness and strength, residual stresses, and manufacturing challenges.

Innovation Solution

A composite core comprising a plurality of tubes with fibers wound in a candy stripe pattern, where adjacent tubes are adhesively bonded, allowing for varied winding angles to optimize shear and compression strength, and featuring a porous core with small holes to reduce material usage and enhance structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional honeycomb cores are used to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but mechanical strength and load-carrying capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore weightVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by embedding discrete fibers (such as carbon, glass, or aramid fibers) within the core material matrix. This creates a composite core structure that combines the light weight of the base core material with the high strength of the embedded fibers, thereby improving mechanical strength without significantly increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If core weight is increased to improve load-carrying capability, then load-carrying capability is improved, but weight increases without proportional benefit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-carrying capabilityVSAvoidcore weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the core structure by varying fiber orientation angles, fiber density, and fiber type in different regions of the core. This allows optimization of load-carrying capability in specific directions and regions, achieving higher strength-to-weight ratio by matching material properties to local stress states rather than using a uniform heavy construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If stacked ribbon blocks are used to increase wall thickness, then weight increases by approximately 30%, but load-carrying capability does not increase proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewall strengthVSAvoidcore weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating reinforcement fibers specifically at critical locations within the core where stress and load concentrations occur. Rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the core, fibers are placed locally at cell nodes and along cell walls to provide targeted strength enhancement where most needed, maintaining overall weight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by embedding discrete fibers (such as carbon, glass, or aramid fibers) within the core material matrix. This creates a composite core structure that combines the light weight of the base core material with the high strength of the embedded fibers, thereby improving mechanical strength without significantly increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If ribbons are stacked to form core blocks, then manufacturing is simplified, but uneven stiffness and strength in different directions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidstiffness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying fiber orientation and density in different regions of the core to achieve uniform overall properties. By strategically placing fibers at specific angles and concentrations in different cell walls and nodes, the design compensates for the directional bias introduced by ribbon stacking, creating a more isotropic structural response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses asymmetry by intentionally varying fiber orientation angles and densities in different regions of the core to counterbalance the inherent asymmetry of stacked ribbons. This asymmetric reinforcement strategy ensures that stiffness and strength are more evenly distributed across different directions, overcoming the directional weakness of the ribbon stacking approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

5Adaptability or versatility

If unbalanced or unsymmetrical layup is used in ribbons, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but ribbon distortion and twisting occur after cure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayup flexibilityVSAvoidribbon dimensional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by carefully controlling fiber orientation angles, tow spacing, and resin content during the layup process. By optimizing these parameters, the design achieves the desired flexibility and tailoring capability while maintaining dimensional stability and preventing distortion during curing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the fiber reinforcement pattern and properties before final assembly and curing. This includes pre-tensioning fibers, pre-positioning reinforcement layers, and pre-establishing proper layup sequences to prevent distortion and ensure dimensional accuracy before the structure is locked in place during curing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved mechanical strength, reduced weight, and tailored stiffness in composite sandwich structures, addressing the limitations of conventional cores by enhancing load-carrying capacity and manufacturing ease while minimizing material usage and residual stresses.

Implementation Method 1

each of the plurality of tubes comprising a single tow or split tow of fibers wound in a single candy stripe pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite materials: Composite Materials

Implementation Method 2

Adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes are adhesively bonded, or infused, to one another along sides of the adjacent tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

A resin is introduced into the preform by a number of means, including vacuum assisted resin transfer molding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum assisted resin transfer molding:

Implementation Method 4

featuring a porous core with small holes to reduce material usage and enhance structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS9713913B2Composite core and method of making same
Publication Date: 2017.07.25 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US9713913B2 patent drawing
  • US9713913B2 patent drawing
  • US9713913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite core includes a plurality of tubes, each the plurality of tubes comprising a plurality of fibers disposed in a polymeric matrix. Adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes are adhesively bonded to one another along sides of the adjacent tubes. A method of making a composite core includes the steps of providing a plurality of tubes, each of the plurality of tubes including a plurality of fibers disposed in a polymeric matrix, and adhesively bonding adjacent tubes of the plurality of tubes along sides of the adjacent tubes. A method of making a composite core such that a removable band is included in the core, the removable band being configured to be removable through a procedure subsequent to the cure of the composite core, thereby producing gaps in the core.