Composite Cross Arm Design for Power Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current composite cross arms in the power industry face challenges such as high costs, structural and mechanical limitations, and installation issues, while wooden structures have reduced lifespan due to environmental concerns, and steel structures are costly due to safety concerns related to electrical conductivity.

Innovation Solution

A composite structural element with a unique design featuring a rectangular outer cross section and a hollow curvilinear inner core, which maximizes strength-to-weight ratio by adjusting inner core dimensions without changing external dimensions, providing enhanced load capability and corrosion resistance, and eliminating the need for additional hardware and bracing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If composite arms are designed in various rectangular shapes to meet structural requirements, then load capability is improved, but device complexity and hardware requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capabilityVSAvoidstructural variation and hardware multiplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a universal T-shaped composite arm design that can serve multiple structural functions across different power distribution scenarios. The standardized T-shape configuration with specific dimensional ratios (flange width to web height) allows the same basic structure to accommodate various loading conditions through selective placement and orientation, eliminating the need for multiple specialized arm shapes and associated hardware variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the dimensions of the T-shaped cross-section (flange width, web height, wall thickness) and the positioning of attachment points to achieve different load capabilities from a single standardized form. This allows one basic structure type to be adapted to multiple structural requirements through dimensional scaling rather than requiring fundamentally different geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If wood structures are used for cross arms, then cost is reduced, but service life and performance deteriorate due to environmental concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials, specifically fiber-reinforced polymers (such as glass fiber or carbon fiber reinforced epoxy or polyester resins), to create cross arms that combine the low cost advantage of non-metallic materials with the long service life and environmental resistance required for durable power distribution infrastructure. These composite materials provide corrosion resistance, electrical insulation, and structural strength while maintaining cost-effectiveness compared to steel alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If steel structures are used for cross arms, then strength is improved, but cost increases due to safety concerns related to electrical conductivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmaterial cost and safety measures
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fiber-reinforced composite materials that provide structural strength comparable to steel while maintaining electrical insulation properties. The fiber-matrix composite structure delivers high strength-to-weight ratio and structural rigidity without the electrical conductivity issues that plague steel cross arms, thereby eliminating the need for additional safety measures such as insulation coatings or special grounding arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If composite arms are designed to maximize load capability, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capabilityVSAvoidarm weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages the inherent high strength-to-weight ratio of fiber-reinforced composite materials. The anisotropic nature of these composites allows optimization of fiber orientation to match principal stress directions, achieving maximum structural efficiency with minimal material usage. This results in cross arms that are both lightweight and structurally optimized for their intended load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating material and structural reinforcement only in regions where stresses are highest, such as the T-junction area and attachment points. The varying wall thickness and strategic placement of structural elements ensure that material is distributed efficiently to provide strength where needed while minimizing weight in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9790704B2Composite structural support arm
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 POWER COMPOSITES
  • US9790704B2 patent drawing
  • US9790704B2 patent drawing
  • US9790704B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fiber-reinforced composite structure, such as a cross arm for use in the power industry, having a rectangular outer cross-sectional shape and an inner hollow core having a curvilinear cross-sectional shape.