Composite Crush Can Structure for Post-Crash Bumper Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy management systems in vehicles face challenges with composite materials shattering under high-energy impacts, leading to detachment of bumper beams from the vehicle, which complicates crash recovery and increases weight.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a composite crush can with frangible and non-frangible portions, where the non-frangible portion maintains the bumper beam's attachment to the vehicle by withstanding higher energy absorption, while the frangible portion deforms to absorb energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If composite materials are used for crush cans to reduce weight, then vehicle weight is reduced, but the composite materials shatter under high-energy impacts causing bumper beam detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle weightVSAvoidbumper beam attachment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The crush can is divided into two distinct portions: a frangible portion made of composite material for energy absorption, and a non-frangible portion made of metal for maintaining attachment reliability. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the crush can are assigned different material properties: the frangible portion uses lightweight composite material with lower energy absorption capacity, while the non-frangible portion uses stronger metal material with higher energy absorption capacity to ensure attachment security at critical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If frangible portion deforms to absorb energy, then energy absorption is improved, but the portion may be destroyed leading to detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidattachment retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The crush can is segmented into frangible and non-frangible portions, allowing the frangible portion to safely deform and absorb energy while the non-frangible portion remains intact to maintain attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The non-frangible portion acts as an intermediary between the frangible portion and the vehicle body, absorbing excess energy that the frangible portion cannot handle and ensuring the attachment remains secure even when the frangible portion is destroyed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If non-frangible portion withstands higher energy absorption, then attachment reliability is improved, but the portion cannot deform to absorb energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidenergy absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The crush can is divided into frangible and non-frangible portions, with the frangible portion designed to deform and absorb energy while the non-frangible portion maintains attachment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions have different material properties optimized for their specific functions: the frangible portion uses composite material for energy absorption, while the non-frangible portion uses metal for attachment security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If composite crush can is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but the frangible portion may shatter causing debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoiddebris generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The crush can is segmented into frangible and non-frangible portions, containing the shattering to the frangible portion while the non-frangible portion maintains structural integrity and reduces debris.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The potential harmful shattering of composite material is converted into a beneficial energy absorption mechanism, where the controlled destruction of the frangible portion absorbs crash energy while the non-frangible portion prevents harmful debris dispersion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures the bumper beam remains attached post-crash, allowing easier recovery and reduces vehicle weight by using lighter composite materials effectively.

Implementation Method 1

If a sufficiently high-energy crash occurs then the crush can is plastically deformed and crushed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

the non-frangible portion of the at least one crush can is capable of absorbing a higher amount of energy (per unit mass) upon impact than the frangible portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3986755B1Securing method for composite structure post-crash
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • EP3986755B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3986755B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3986755B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An energy management system for a vehicle which includes a bumper beam (106, 206, 1602) and at least one crush can (102A-B, 202A-B, 400, 500, 600, 700, 1000, 1400, 1818, 1900) made from composite materials. The crush can includes at least one frangible portion (410, 510, 518, 610, 710, 810, 1910), and at least one non-frangible portion (412, 512, 612, 712A-D, 812, 1908). The crush can further includes at least one fixing aperture (416A-B, 516A-B, 616A-B, 716A-D, 816, 1916) configured to receive a fixing, the at least one fixing aperture extending through the at least one frangible portion and through the at least non-frangible portion of the crush can.