Composite Electrode Material for Vacuum Interrupters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrode materials for vacuum interrupters face challenges in achieving a balance between high current interruption and withstand voltage capabilities, with existing materials either compromising on mechanical strength, workability, or requiring high energy for stabilization treatments, and struggling with fouling issues that affect stability.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing method involving the formation of a composite electrode material with a center part of a Cu—Cr—heat resistant element system and an outer circumferential part of pure Cr, where the center part is infiltrated with a conductive element like Cu, achieving superior current interruption and withstand voltage capabilities by promoting uniform dispersion of Cr and heat resistant element particles within the Cu phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Cr powder and heat resistant element powder are mixed with Cu powder and sintered to improve current interruption capability and withstand voltage capability, then electrical characteristics are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent interruption capability and withstand voltage capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining Cu powder, Cr powder, and heat resistant element powder (Mo, W, Nb, Ta, V, or Zr) in specific weight ratios to create an electrode material that simultaneously achieves high current interruption capability, withstand voltage capability, and mechanical strength. The composite structure allows each component to contribute its advantageous properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes parameters including particle size distribution (mixing fine powder ≤10μm with coarse powder >10μm in specific ratios), weight ratios of components (Cu:Cr-heat resistant element = 95:5 to 70:30), and sintering conditions (temperature 800-1200°C, time 1-10 hours, atmosphere control) to achieve the desired balance between electrical characteristics and manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If Cr content and heat resistant element content are increased to improve electrical characteristics, then current interruption capability and withstand voltage capability improve, but mechanical strength decreases and workability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent interruption capability and withstand voltage capabilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains mechanical strength by controlling the total content of Cr and heat resistant element at 5-30 wt%, and by optimizing the particle size distribution with a mix of fine (≤10μm) and coarse (>10μm) powders. This parameter optimization ensures that electrical characteristics are improved while mechanical properties are preserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates local quality variations through the bimodal particle size distribution, where fine particles fill interstices and provide electrical conductivity, while coarse particles provide structural framework and mechanical strength. This local differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of electrical and mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If fine powder is used to achieve uniform dispersion of Cr particles, then electrical characteristics improve, but sintering energy consumption increases and manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform dispersion of Cr particlesVSAvoidsintering energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a bimodal particle size distribution (fine powder ≤10μm mixed with coarse powder >10μm) where the fine particles provide uniform dispersion and electrical conductivity, while the coarse particles reduce total surface area and thus sintering energy requirements. The specific ratio is controlled to balance these effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fine particles are strategically distributed within the structure formed by coarse particles, creating local regions of high conductivity while maintaining overall structural integrity. This local quality approach allows uniform Cr particle dispersion without requiring all particles to be fine, thus reducing total sintering energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If stabilization treatment energy is increased to improve withstand voltage capability, then electrical characteristics improve, but fouling inside vacuum interrupter increases and stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewithstand voltage capabilityVSAvoidfouling inside vacuum interrupter
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces the energy required for stabilization treatment by optimizing the composition (Cr + heat resistant element at 5-30 wt%), controlling particle size distribution (fine ≤10μm and coarse >10μm mixture), and adjusting sintering parameters (temperature 800-1200°C, time 1-10 hours). These parameter optimizations create a surface that requires less energy to stabilize and produces less fouling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The composite material structure with Cr and heat resistant element in Cu matrix provides inherent resistance to fouling during arc operations. The heat resistant element specifically helps prevent excessive material vaporization and deposition inside the vacuum interrupter, reducing fouling while maintaining withstand voltage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in an electrode material with enhanced mechanical strength, reduced contact resistance, and improved capacitor switching capabilities, while minimizing the energy required for stabilization treatments and preventing fouling within the vacuum interrupter.

Implementation Method 1

infiltrating the integrally molded body with a conductive element selected from Cu, Ag and an alloy of Cu and Ag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

sintering the molded body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS10614969B2Method for manufacturing electrode material and electrode material
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 MEIDENSHA CORP
  • US10614969B2 patent drawing
  • US10614969B2 patent drawing
  • US10614969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for manufacturing an electrode material (1), wherein the electrode material includes: a center part (2) containing Cu, Cr and a heat resistant element and having superior large-current interruption and capacitor switching capabilities; and an outer circumferential part (3) disposed on an outer circumference of the center part (2). The outer circumferential part (3) contains Cu and Cr and has superior withstand voltage capability. The electrode material (1) is manufactured by molding a solid solution powder of Cr and the heat resistant element, molding a Cr powder integrally around an outer circumference of the molded body of the solid solution powder and infiltrating the integrally molded body with Cu etc.