Composite End Mill Helix Layout to Prevent Delamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shaft milling cutters struggle to achieve high surface quality and prevent delamination or fiber overhangs when milling composite materials like fiber composite plastics (FVK).

Innovation Solution

A shaft milling cutter with a defined cutting direction, featuring a cutting part with first and second circumferential cutting edges of alternating positive and negative twist angles. The cutting part is designed to produce an almost exclusively pulling cut in the front length area and an almost exclusively pressing cut in the rear length area, generating axial forces that compress the material and prevent delamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional end mills with uniform helix direction are used, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but delamination and fiber protrusions occur on the machined surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidtool manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting part is divided into two distinct sections: a front longitudinal section with first circumferential cutting edges of first helix direction, and a rear longitudinal section with second circumferential cutting edges of second helix direction. This segmentation allows each section to perform different cutting functions (pulling vs. pushing), preventing delamination and fiber protrusions while maintaining manufacturability through systematic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the cutting part are assigned different helix directions to optimize local cutting performance. The front section uses one helix direction for pulling cuts, while the rear section uses the opposite helix direction for pushing cuts. This local differentiation addresses the specific requirements of different cutting zones to achieve high surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If first and second circumferential cutting edges are ground into separate front and rear longitudinal sections, then opposing axial forces are generated to prevent delamination, but the formation of the cutting part becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of delaminationVSAvoidtool production time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting part is segmented into front and rear longitudinal sections with distinct helix directions. This segmentation enables the generation of opposing axial forces that compress fiber composite layers, reliably preventing delamination and fiber protrusions while allowing for a systematic manufacturing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting edges are arranged in a periodic pattern around the rotational axis, with alternating first and second circumferential cutting edges having opposite helix directions. This periodic arrangement ensures consistent opposing axial forces are generated during rotation, preventing delamination while enabling efficient tool formation through standardized grinding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If cutting edges with alternating helix directions are implemented, then compression forces are generated to separate fiber layers, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber layer separationVSAvoidcutting part structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting part is divided into front and rear longitudinal sections with different helix directions, creating a structured approach to generating compression forces. This segmentation achieves reliable fiber layer separation while maintaining manageable device complexity through systematic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting part structure serves multiple functions: the front section performs pulling cuts while the rear section performs pushing cuts, both contributing to fiber layer separation. This multi-functionality is achieved within a unified end mill structure, balancing device complexity with effective fiber layer separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3782752B1End mill
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 GUEHRING KG
  • EP3782752B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3782752B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP3782752B1 patent drawingFigure 6~15

AI summary

The invention relates to an end mill (10) for milling composite materials, e.g.Fiber-reinforced plastics, with a defined direction of rotation, a shank (200) and a cutting element (100), wherein the cutting element (100) extends from a shank-side end (130) to a face-side end (120) and has, in a front longitudinal region (121) adjacent to the face-side end (120) of the cutting element (100), a plurality of first cutting ribs (122) extending with a positive helix angle (α1) with first circumferential cutting edges (1221), each adjoining a first groove (1222) extending with a positive helix angle (α1), and in a rear longitudinal region (131) adjacent to the shank-side end (130) of the cutting element (100), a plurality of second cutting ribs (132) extending with a negative helix angle (α2) with second circumferential cutting edges (1321), each adjoining a adjacent to the second groove (1322) which runs with a negative helix angle (α2).According to the invention, each first cutting edge (122) has at least one third circumferential cutting edge (1223) downstream of the first circumferential cutting edge (1221), which adjoins a third groove (1224) which has a smaller groove cross-section than the first groove (1222), and each second cutting edge (132) has at least one fourth circumferential cutting edge (1323) downstream of the second circumferential cutting edge (1321), which adjoins a fourth groove (1324) which has a smaller groove cross-section than the second groove (1322).