Composite Engine Cover Structure for Noise Insulation and Fastening Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine covers fail to provide adequate protection against foreign objects and noise leakage while maintaining structural integrity and heat management, with sound-absorbing materials lacking sufficient rigidity and strength.

Innovation Solution

A composite cover integrating a reinforcing body with a sound-absorbing main body, using insert molding to combine hard urethane and synthetic resin, with strategically placed fastening points to distribute load and enhance rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional engine cover is used without drainage holes, then the structural integrity and simplicity are maintained, but water accumulation occurs leading to rust and deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to rust and deteriorationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The engine cover is segmented into multiple functional zones: a water collection area with drainage holes, a reinforcement rib structure, and a sealing area. The drainage holes are strategically positioned to divide and channel water flow to specific drainage paths, preventing water accumulation while maintaining structural integrity through the rib reinforcements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Drainage holes are introduced as intermediary elements that mediate between the water accumulation problem and the engine cover structure. These holes allow controlled water passage while the surrounding reinforcement ribs act as intermediaries to maintain structural strength at the weakened areas where holes are created.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If drainage holes are added to the engine cover, then water drainage is improved, but structural strength is reduced at the hole locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater drainage capabilityVSAvoidstructural strength at drainage locations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The engine cover employs local quality enhancement by adding reinforcement ribs specifically at and around the drainage hole locations. These localized reinforcements concentrate structural strength where it is most needed (at the hole perimeters) without adding ribs to the entire cover, thus maintaining overall structural integrity while enabling effective drainage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement ribs are pre-positioned around the drainage holes during manufacturing, providing structural support before water drainage issues can occur. This preliminary structural preparation ensures that the drainage holes do not become weak points in the engine cover structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If the engine cover structure is reinforced to maintain strength with drainage holes, then structural integrity is maintained, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement ribs and drainage hole structures are merged into a single integrated engine cover component rather than being separate parts. This merging allows the ribs to be formed simultaneously with the cover body during injection molding, simplifying manufacturing by eliminating separate assembly steps while maintaining the structural benefits of the reinforcement ribs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement ribs serve multiple functions: they strengthen the engine cover structure, provide attachment points for seals or other components, and guide water flow toward drainage holes. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate structural elements, simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4365424B1Cover for automobile engine
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 SUMITOMO RIKO CO LTD
  • EP4365424B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4365424B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4365424B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention addresses the problem of providing, in a state ensuring high strength, a cover responsible for the protection and noise insulation of a crank pulley, auxiliary drive belt, etc., in a longitudinal engine in which a crankshaft is disposed facing toward the front of the vehicle body. This cover 30 includes a sound absorbing body 33 made of a material such as hard urethane, and a hard reinforcing body 34 in which the sound absorbing body is insert-molded, the cover being formed in a tray shape as a whole. Fastening parts 35-38 fixed to the engine by bolts are provided to outer ends of the reinforcing body 34. Since the pressing force from the bolts does not directly affect the sound absorbing body 33, high fastening strength can be achieved while ensuring a high protection function and sound insulation function.