Composite Floor Structure with Protruding Bar Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing floor structures with crossed reinforcement rods face difficulties in manufacturing due to the need for full shoring, which increases labor, cost, and complexity, while also being unable to correctly house or support reticular reinforcement metal structures.

Innovation Solution

A floor structure comprising composite construction elements with an elongated body of expanded plastic material and a substantially reticular reinforcement metal structure, where the reinforcement metal structure is supported by a protruding reinforcing section bar at a predetermined distance from the upper face of the expanded plastic material, allowing for self-supporting characteristics and reduced use of temporary supports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If full shoring is used to contain concrete casting, then manufacturing capability is improved, but labor and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoidfull shoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The composite construction element is designed to be self-supporting during concrete casting, eliminating the need for external full shoring. The element's structural design allows it to withstand the weight and pressure of the concrete without requiring additional temporary supporting formwork, thereby reducing labor and complexity while maintaining manufacturing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The composite construction element serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as both the structural floor element and the supporting formwork during concrete casting. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate full shoring systems, reducing device complexity and labor requirements while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Weight of stationary object

If composite construction elements are used, then weight is reduced, but ability to support reticular reinforcement metal structure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor structure weightVSAvoidsupport capability for reinforcement metal structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The construction element combines expanded plastic material with integrated reinforcing section bars to create a composite structure. This composite design provides both the weight reduction benefits of expanded plastic and the strength necessary to support reticular reinforcement metal structures, resolving the contradiction between lightness and support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing section bars are strategically positioned within the composite construction element at locations where maximum support strength is needed. This local reinforcement approach ensures adequate support capability for the reticular reinforcement metal structure while maintaining overall element lightness and avoiding unnecessary weight throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If protruding bar upper portion is added, then support capability is improved, but element complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport capabilityVSAvoidelement structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing section bar with its protruding upper portion is integrated directly into the composite construction element during manufacturing. This merging of the support structure with the floor element itself provides enhanced support capability while avoiding the need for separate, complex assembly operations, thereby limiting the increase in overall element complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8006450B2Composite floor structure with a protruding bar upper portion in a floor element groove
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 PLASTEDIL
  • US8006450B2 patent drawing
  • US8006450B2 patent drawing
  • US8006450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A floor structure (1) of the type having “crossed reinforcement rods” is described comprising:a) a plurality of composite construction elements (2) arranged side by side and comprising:a1) an elongated body (3) made of expanded plastic material provided with an upper face (3a);a2) at least one reinforcing section bar (4) longitudinally extending in the elongated body (3) and having an upper portion (4c) protruding from the upper face (3a) of the body (3);b) a substantially reticular reinforcement metal structure (10) of a concrete casting (9), supported by the upper portion (4c) of the aforementioned at least one reinforcing section bar (4) at a predetermined distance from the upper face (3a) of the elongated body (3) made of expanded plastic material.Advantageously, the floor structure (1) exhibits lightness and self-supporting characteristics and allows to achieve a substantial reduction of the labor and costs for its manufacture.