Composite Fragmentation Cap Integrally Bonded to Projectile

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-personnel rounds lack sufficient structural integrity and lethal effect, particularly when attempting to perforate urban targets, due to limitations in fragmenting materials and cap design.

Innovation Solution

A composite fragmentation cap is created by embedding preformed fragments in a matrix bonded to a steel underbody using hot isostatic pressing, enhancing both structural integrity and lethality through tailored fragment size, shape, and material selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If matrixed fragmentation caps are used, then fragmentation effect is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates due to insufficient structural members

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragmentation effectVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining a metal matrix with embedded fragmentation preforms to create a structure that simultaneously provides both fragmentation effect and structural integrity. The metal matrix serves as the structural backbone while the embedded preforms provide the fragmentation capability, resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If larger fragmentation caps are used, then lethal effect is improved, but volume occupied increases reducing warhead space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelethal effectVSAvoidwarhead space
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the distribution, density, and characteristics of fragmentation preforms within different regions of the metal matrix. This allows optimization of lethal effect in specific zones while maintaining compact overall dimensions, thereby improving lethal effect without proportionally increasing total volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If enhanced fragmentation steel is used, then fragmentation capability is improved, but area of effect remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragmentation capabilityVSAvoidarea of effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the fragmentation system into discrete preformed fragments embedded within a continuous metal matrix. This segmentation allows for optimized fragment geometry and distribution patterns that increase the effective area of effect compared to traditional enhanced fragmentation steel approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides increased lethality and structural integrity, allowing for improved performance in penetrating urban targets while maintaining manufacturing feasibility and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

The contained processing assembly is then placed inside a hot isostatic press. The hot isostatic press is then heated and pressurized to a pre-determined maximum pressure and maximum temperature for the selected binder powder material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot isostatic pressing: Hot Isostatic Pressing

Implementation Method 2

The high temperature, high pressure operation turns the powdered metal binder into a solid piece near the theoretical maximum density of the material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh pressure consolidation: Compression

Implementation Method 3

A vacuum is then drawn, under a prescribed heating cycle, through the stem in order to remove any gas in the powder that would cause irregularities during the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) process.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum degassing: Vacuum

Implementation Method 4

At an elevated temperature below the melting point of the canister and underbody materials, a pressurized inert gas such as argon consolidates the canister and its contents.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInert gas pressurization: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS10712137B1Method for making a composite fragmentation cap that is integrally formed onto a projectile body
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US10712137B1 patent drawing
  • US10712137B1 patent drawing
  • US10712137B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Process for making a fragmentation warhead using hot isostatic pressing where tungsten spheres, powdered steel, and interlock features on a mandrel are consolidated in a matrix. Then in the finished part, the front fragmentation cap, rear and interior geometries are machined, resulting in a finished warhead with an enhanced performance fragmentation cap integrally bonded to it.