Composite Bicycle Front Sprocket for Cross-Chaining Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional bicycle front sprockets, being flat and made from metals, suffer from low lateral stiffness, leading to inefficiencies and mechanical issues due to cross-chaining in bicycles with multiple rear gears, which results in a loss of drive efficiency and potential mechanical problems.

Innovation Solution

A composite front sprocket assembly is created using a metallic outer assembly and a carbon fiber reinforced nylon or plastic center assembly, with a crank drive ring, where the materials are combined through injection molding or composite layering to enhance stiffness and reduce material waste, eliminating the need for external fastening devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a traditional metallic front sprocket is used, then strength is adequate, but lateral stiffness is low leading to drive efficiency loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidlateral stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The front sprocket is constructed as a composite structure with a metallic outer assembly providing strength and a carbon fiber reinforced plastic center assembly providing lateral stiffness. This composite approach allows the sprocket to simultaneously achieve adequate strength from the metal components and high lateral stiffness from the carbon fiber reinforcement, resolving the contradiction between strength and lateral stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the front sprocket are assigned different materials based on their functional requirements: the outer assembly uses metal for strength and wear resistance where it contacts the chain, while the center assembly uses carbon fiber reinforced plastic for lateral stiffness where it connects to the crank arms. This local differentiation of material properties optimizes both strength and lateral stiffness in their respective locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If metal is used for the front sprocket, then strength is sufficient, but material waste occurs due to subtractive manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The front sprocket is divided into two separate assemblies: a metallic outer assembly and a carbon fiber reinforced plastic center assembly. Each assembly can be manufactured independently using optimal processes (casting or machining for metal, molding for composite), reducing material waste in each segment. The segmented design allows for more efficient material utilization compared to a monolithic metal sprocket requiring extensive subtractive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By using composite materials, the center assembly can be manufactured through molding processes that add material rather than remove it, significantly reducing waste compared to the subtractive machining required for traditional metal sprockets. The metallic outer assembly can be cast or formed with minimal post-processing, also reducing material waste while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If a flat-structure front sprocket is used, then manufacturing is simple, but lateral stiffness is insufficient under cross-chaining loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidlateral stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The carbon fiber reinforced plastic center assembly provides high lateral stiffness through the inherent properties of carbon fiber reinforcement, which can be oriented to resist lateral loads from cross-chaining. This composite structure achieves the required stiffness without requiring complex geometries or additional stiffening features, maintaining ease of manufacture through standard composite molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from considering only the planar dimensions of a flat sprocket to incorporating the thickness dimension and internal structure of a composite laminate. The carbon fiber reinforcement can be layered and oriented through the thickness of the center assembly to provide lateral stiffness without increasing the overall footprint or complicating the external geometry, thus maintaining manufacturing simplicity while achieving the required stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11788615B2Bicycle front sprocket
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 FOX FACTORY INC
  • US11788615B2 patent drawing
  • US11788615B2 patent drawing
  • US11788615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for a composite bicycle front sprocket are disclosed herein. One embodiment discloses a composite bicycle front sprocket assembly having an outer assembly of a first material. The bicycle front sprocket assembly also has a center assembly of a second material. The center assembly is disposed at least partially within the outer assembly. The center assembly is irremovably coupled with the outer assembly. The center assembly is irremovably coupled with the outer assembly without an external fastening device to irremovably couple the center assembly with the outer assembly.