Composite Grille with T-Shaped Cross Sections for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite material grilles are heavy and have poor resistance to mechanical stresses, requiring excessive material and weight to achieve high bearing capacities, which is costly and inefficient in production.

Innovation Solution

A composite structure with T- or L-shaped cross sections for oblong elements, allowing for a lighter design with enhanced mechanical resistance and reduced material usage, achieved through a method of molding that maintains structural integrity and reduces production time and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional rectangular or trapezoid cross-section oblong elements are used, then the grille can be easily removed from the mold, but the structure becomes heavy and has poor mechanical resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of removal from moldVSAvoidmechanical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by transitioning from symmetric rectangular cross-sections to asymmetric T-shaped and L-shaped cross-sections. These asymmetric shapes provide superior mechanical resistance while maintaining ease of mold removal through careful design of the asymmetric geometry that avoids undercuts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the oblong elements by introducing T-shaped and L-shaped cross-sections with specific dimensional relationships. The parameters include the width, height, and thickness ratios that optimize both structural strength and moldability, achieving weight reduction of 20-30% while maintaining or improving mechanical resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If more material is used to increase bearing capacity, then mechanical resistance improves, but weight and production cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing capacityVSAvoidgrille weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating material in strategically located T-shaped and L-shaped cross-sections where mechanical strength is most needed, rather than uniformly distributing material throughout the entire structure. This localized reinforcement achieves high bearing capacity with reduced overall material usage and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials consisting of polymer resin matrices reinforced with fibrous reinforcements (glass fibers, carbon fibers, aramid fibers). This composite structure provides high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling the grille to achieve superior mechanical resistance while maintaining reduced weight compared to traditional homogeneous materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If traditional molding techniques are used, then production is straightforward, but production time and material costs are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple oblong elements into a monolithic structure formed in a single molding operation. The mold cavity is designed to simultaneously form multiple T-shaped and L-shaped oblong elements that are interconnected, eliminating the need for separate production and assembly steps, thereby reducing production time and material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the mold cavity into multiple regions that each form specific T-shaped or L-shaped oblong elements, allowing for optimized material distribution and reduced overall material consumption while maintaining structural integrity through the monolithic construction approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a lighter composite structure with increased mechanical resistance and reduced material needs, achieving a weight savings of at least 20-30% while maintaining or exceeding the mechanical properties of traditional designs, and significantly reducing production times and costs.

Implementation Method 1

molding a polymer resin which, polymerizing, incorporates inside itself the fibers present, generating the grille with predefined mechanical properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentEP3292255B1Compound structure made of composite material and method of production
Publication Date: 2019.12.11 FIBROLUX
  • EP3292255B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3292255B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3292255B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

Compound structure made of composite material, such as fiber-reinforced polymer resin, comprising first oblong elements (11) reciprocally distanced and parallel to each other and second oblong elements (12)) reciprocally distanced, parallel to each other and crisscrossed with respect to the first oblong elements (11). The first oblong elements (11) and the second oblong elements (12) are made in a single body to define a reticular structure (13; 13a, 13b) with a monolithic flat shape