Composite Image Compression Parameter Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for compressing composite images in multi-functional peripherals (MFPs) often result in image deterioration, particularly when using high compression ratios for both scanned and print data, leading to suboptimal image quality.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that checks the type of each image to be composited and selects an appropriate compression parameter based on the combination of scanned and print data, using a checking unit, selection unit, and image compression unit to optimize the compression ratio for the composite image.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If high compression ratio is used for composite image, then image memory size is reduced, but image deterioration occurs in PDL image data portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage memory sizeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the composite image into different regions corresponding to scanned image data and PDL image data. The checking unit identifies each region's type, and the selection unit applies different compression parameters to different regions - high compression ratio for scanned image portions and low compression ratio for PDL image portions. This segmentation allows simultaneous optimization of both memory size reduction and image quality preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality control by applying different compression parameters to different regions of the composite image based on the local characteristics of each region. Scanned image regions receive high compression parameters while PDL image regions receive low compression parameters, ensuring that each region is compressed according to its specific quality requirements rather than applying a uniform compression ratio to the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If low compression ratio is used for composite image, then image quality is maintained, but image memory size is not reduced efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidimage memory size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the composite image into scanned image regions and PDL image regions, allowing differential compression strategies. Scanned image regions are compressed with high compression ratios to achieve significant memory size reduction, while PDL image regions use low compression ratios to maintain quality, resulting in overall efficient memory utilization without unnecessary quality loss in regions where it matters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes compression parameters based on the local characteristics of image regions. The checking unit determines the type of each region, and the selection unit adjusts compression parameters accordingly - using high compression parameters for scanned regions and low compression parameters for PDL regions. This parameter adaptation enables optimal balance between memory size reduction and quality maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If uniform compression parameter is applied to composite image, then processing is simplified, but severe image deterioration occurs in PDL image data portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a checking unit that segments the composite image into scanned and PDL regions, enabling differentiated compression processing. Although this adds processing steps, it prevents severe image deterioration in PDL regions by identifying them and applying appropriate low compression parameters, while allowing high compression for scanned regions where quality loss is less noticeable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically checking and identifying the type of each image region without user intervention. The checking unit autonomously determines whether each region is scanned or PDL data, and the selection unit automatically selects appropriate compression parameters, eliminating the need for manual parameter setting while ensuring optimal quality preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7526135B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, program, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2009.04.28 CANON KK
  • US7526135B2 patent drawing
  • US7526135B2 patent drawing
  • US7526135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes an image composition unit configured to generate a composite image by compositing first and second images, a specification unit configured to specify a generation process of the first and second images, and a selection unit configured to select a compression parameter to compress the composite image based on the combination of the generation process of the first and second images specified by the specification unit. In addition, an image compression unit is configured to compress the composite image using the compression parameter selected by the selection unit. The image composition unit generates the composite image by compositing the first image regarded as a semitransparent image and the second image.