Composite Joist Floor Stand-off Fastener Hardness Profile

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite floor systems are time-consuming and prone to installation errors, requiring significant labor and materials to achieve the same load-bearing capacity, while also being costly and difficult to install safely.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of stand-off fasteners with specific hardness profiles and thread-forming capabilities, allowing for rapid installation with lower torque requirements and improved load-carrying capacity, combined with a composite joist floor system design that includes corrugated steel decking and cementitious slabs, facilitates faster and more error-free assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional composite floor systems are used with welded shear studs or partial extension of joist upper chord, then load-bearing capacity is achieved, but installation time is excessive and installation complexity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener is divided into distinct functional segments: a fluted lead portion for hole formation, a thread-forming portion for thread creation, and a threaded portion for clamping. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific function efficiently, reducing overall installation time and complexity while maintaining load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fluted lead portion performs preliminary action by forming the fastener opening in the joist upper chord before the thread-forming portion creates threads. This preliminary hole formation reduces resistance during thread formation, enabling faster installation with lower torque requirements and reducing installation errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional fastening methods are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but labor costs and material costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener utilizes controlled hardness variations at different portions: the fluted lead portion and thread-forming portion have higher hardness (HRC 50-65) for cutting and forming operations, while the threaded portion has lower hardness (HRB 70-HRC 40) for ductility and clamping. This parameter change enables easier installation with standard tools and reduces material waste from installation errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The thread-forming portion automatically creates threads in the joist upper chord as the fastener is driven in, eliminating the need for pre-drilled holes or separate threading operations. The fluted lead portion self-forms the initial opening, making the installation process self-sufficient and reducing labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If higher torque is applied during fastener installation, then thread-forming capability is improved, but drive torque requirement increases installation difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread-forming precisionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener applies local quality through differentiated hardness at specific portions. The thread-forming portion has high hardness (HRC 50-65) concentrated exactly where thread formation occurs, providing precise thread cutting capability. The fluted lead portion also has high hardness for clean hole formation. This localized hardness distribution achieves precise thread-forming without requiring excessive overall torque.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical cutting action of the fluted lead portion replaces the need for conventional drilling operations, and the thread-forming portion replaces separate threading operations. This substitution of mechanical actions reduces the cumulative torque requirements and simplifies the installation process while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8621806B2Composite joist floor system
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 NUCOR CORP
  • US8621806B2 patent drawing
  • US8621806B2 patent drawing
  • US8621806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The composite joist floor system includes joists supporting metal decking and a stand-off fasteners are spaced along the length of the joist Each fastener has an upper portion with a through hardness between HRB 70 and HRC 40 and a lower portion having a threaded portion with a through hardness of between HRB 70 and HRC 40 and a thread-forming portion adjacent the threaded portion with at least a HRC 50 hardness and failure torque to thread-forming torque of at least 3.0 and a drive torque at least 20% less than a thread-forming torque, and a fluted lead portion adjacent the thread-forming portion with a nominal diameter between 70 and 95% of major diameter of the threaded portion adapted to form a fastener opening. These stand-off fasteners extend into and are encapsulated by a cementitious slab supported by the metal decking to form a composite floor system.