Composite Magnet Interface Layer for Hard-Soft Phase Transition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional composite magnets lack optimal magnetic properties due to the abrupt transition between magnetically-hard and magnetically-soft regions, leading to suboptimal performance and increased material costs.

Innovation Solution

A composite magnet design incorporating distinct magnetically-hard, magnetically-soft, and interface regions with different compositions, where the interface region eases the transition between hard and soft materials, allowing for a more gradual transition and reduced material costs through the use of an interface/transition material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an abrupt transition between magnetically-hard and magnetically-soft regions is used, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the magnetic properties (coercivity and energy product) are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic propertiesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnet is divided into three distinct regions: magnetically-hard region, interface region, and magnetically-soft region. This segmentation allows each region to have optimized properties, with the interface region serving as a transition zone that improves overall magnetic performance while maintaining manufacturability through defined structural zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the magnet are assigned different material compositions and magnetic properties. The magnetically-hard region provides high coercivity, the magnetically-soft region provides high saturation magnetization, and the interface region provides a gradual transition, optimizing local properties to achieve superior overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If high-performance permanent magnet materials are used throughout, then magnetic performance is maximized, but material costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic propertiesVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Expensive rare earth permanent magnet materials are used only in the magnetically-hard region where high coercivity is needed, while the magnetically-soft region uses cheaper iron-based materials. This localized material assignment reduces overall material cost while maintaining high performance through the complementary properties of both regions and the interface transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The magnet combines different material systems (rare earth permanent magnet material in the hard region, iron-based material in the soft region) into a composite structure. This composite approach leverages the strengths of each material system while minimizing costs by avoiding the use of expensive materials throughout the entire magnet volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If a gradual transition between hard and soft regions is implemented, then magnetic performance is improved, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The gradual transition is achieved through a defined interface region with specific composition ratios (e.g., 30-70% hard material and 70-30% soft material), creating distinct manufacturable zones rather than requiring continuous gradients. This segmentation makes the gradual transition compatible with standard manufacturing processes like sintering or bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface region uses controlled composition ratios and gradient structures that can be achieved through parameter adjustments in manufacturing processes (e.g., varying powder mixtures, controlled sintering conditions). This allows the gradual transition to be implemented using existing manufacturing techniques with optimized process parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240055164A1Interface materials for composite magnets
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20240055164A1 patent drawing
  • US20240055164A1 patent drawing
  • US20240055164A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Composite magnets such as for electrical machines in vehicles are disclosed. The composite magnets have an interface phase that is different than the magnetically-hard phase and the magnetically-soft phase to ease the transition or create a gradual transition from between the hard and soft phases of the composite magnet. The addition of, for example, an interface layer maintains or enhances performance of the magnetic properties even with higher grain sizes such as beyond the nanoscale level.