Composite Material Interaction Evaluation for Accurate Property Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting the characteristics of composite materials, particularly when new materials are introduced, face challenges in accurately reflecting the influence of interactions between element materials, leading to suboptimal prediction accuracy and difficulty in finding alternative materials that maintain or improve desired characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method that evaluates the influence of interactions between element materials in composite materials by constructing a prediction model, selecting and evaluating specific interactions, and using nonlinear terms to assess the degree of involvement in characteristics, allowing for the specification of materials to replace and the search for alternative materials that maintain or improve desired properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a prediction model is generated by machine learning using known formulation and characteristics as teacher data, then prediction accuracy is improved within the ranges of materials and blending amounts included in teacher data, but prediction accuracy decreases for materials not included in teacher data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to new materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the approach from using fixed teacher data ranges to using interaction information that can adapt to new material combinations. By incorporating interaction terms that capture relationships between materials, the model can generalize to materials outside the original training range while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces interaction information as an intermediary between material properties and predicted characteristics. This interaction layer acts as a mediator that captures material relationships, enabling accurate predictions for new materials by leveraging learned interaction patterns rather than relying solely on direct material property mappings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If element materials are changed to stabilize supply, reduce cost, or adjust physical properties, then material flexibility is improved, but prediction of characteristic changes becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial substitution flexibilityVSAvoidprediction accuracy of characteristic changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements feedback by evaluating the predicted characteristics against actual measured characteristics to calculate interaction information. This feedback loop continuously refines the model's understanding of material interactions, enabling accurate prediction of characteristic changes even when materials are substituted for supply stabilization or cost reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary evaluation of interaction information before material substitution occurs. By pre-calculating and storing interaction characteristics for various material combinations, the system can quickly and accurately predict the impact of potential substitutions without requiring extensive trial-and-error experimentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If interaction between element materials is considered in prediction models, then prediction accuracy for composite material characteristics is improved, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the complex interaction evaluation into distinct components: material property evaluation, interaction information calculation, and characteristic prediction. By dividing the model into these modular segments, each handling specific aspects of material interaction, the overall model complexity is managed while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies partial action by focusing interaction evaluation on the most significant material interactions rather than all possible combinations. This selective approach to interaction analysis maintains prediction accuracy for critical characteristics while reducing computational complexity by excluding less influential interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250022544A1Interaction impact evaluation method, element material identifying method, and substitute material search method
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US20250022544A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022544A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022544A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An interaction impact evaluation method that enable highly accurate prediction of properties or a search for new substitute materials having desired properties is provided. According to the present invention, a step for selecting a kind of interaction due to a plurality of element materials, and a step for evaluating the degree to which the selected interaction is involved with the property of the composite material are performed to evaluate the impact of interaction with respect to the property of a composite material including a plurality of types of element materials.