Composite Microstructure Selection With Concurrent Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for designing composite structures fail to exploit the tailorable nature of composite materials, leading to suboptimal performance due to separate material selection and sizing processes that do not account for the influence of sizing on material selection and vice versa, resulting in low-standard mechanical structures.

Innovation Solution

A multiscale material selection method using processor-implemented algorithms that compute unique material properties and sizing parameters, determining optimal microstructures based on analytical and computational models to satisfy mechanical, structural, and vibrational problem requirements, incorporating Decision-Making Algorithms to explore satisficing solutions under multiple objectives and constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If discrete materials from manufacturer databases are used for material selection, then the material selection process is simplified, but the tailorable nature of composite materials cannot be exploited, leading to suboptimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selection processVSAvoidstructural performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the material selection process from choosing discrete pre-manufactured materials to selecting and tailoring composite materials by adjusting their microstructural parameters. The system computes unique material properties based on selected microstructures (fiber orientation, volume fraction, stacking sequence) and combines them with sizing parameters to achieve optimal performance that cannot be obtained from standard manufacturer databases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If material selection and sizing are performed separately, then the design process is more manageable, but the influence of sizing on material selection and vice versa is not accounted for, resulting in low-standard mechanical structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign process complexityVSAvoidstructural performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the material selection and sizing processes into a single integrated computational framework. The system simultaneously selects microstructural parameters (fiber orientation, volume fraction) and sizing parameters (dimensions, geometry) that together satisfy multiple problem requirements. This concurrent optimization ensures that the chosen material properties and dimensions are mutually compatible and collectively optimal, rather than being determined in separate sequential steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If material selection is performed first and qualified later, then the design workflow is streamlined, but suitable material combinations may be left out, leading to low-standard mechanical structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign workflow efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial combination options
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computation of unique material properties based on selected microstructures before finalizing the material selection. The system pre-calculates how different microstructural configurations will affect material properties and combines this with sizing considerations to identify suitable material combinations early in the design process. This preliminary action ensures that potentially suitable material combinations are not overlooked, as the system evaluates the full range of tailorable composite properties before making selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11740612B2Multiscale material selection method for designing mechanical systems
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US11740612B2 patent drawing
  • US11740612B2 patent drawing
  • US11740612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Conventionally material selection of composite structure is performed by using discrete materials available in manufacturer's databases. Thus, tailorable nature of composite materials is not exploited to achieve superior performance. Further, conventional methods perform material selection and sizing separately and do not take into account the influence of sizing on material selection and vice versa. Embodiments of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for multiscale material selection for designing of mechanical systems that incorporates tailoring of material microstructures and sizing to achieve improved solutions. The microstructure properties are obtained by using analytical and computational models for various composite materials. These models compute structure-property relations between bulk material properties and their micro-structural constituents.