Composite Moderator Medium for Nuclear Reactor Lifetime

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nuclear reactors using single monolithic moderator materials, such as graphite, face limitations in moderator lifetime due to irradiation-induced structural deterioration and generate significant nuclear waste, requiring frequent core changes and posing safety and disposal challenges.

Innovation Solution

A composite moderator medium is developed, comprising a low moderating material like silicon carbide or magnesium oxide combined with a high moderating material like beryllium or boron, encapsulated within the low moderating matrix to enhance stability and extend moderator lifetime, reducing waste and eliminating graphite oxidation issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single monolithic moderator material like graphite is used, then the moderating performance is adequate, but the moderator lifetime is limited due to irradiation-induced structural deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderator lifetimeVSAvoidstructural stability under irradiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining a first moderating material (e.g., graphite) with a second moderating material (e.g., beryllium oxide, beryllium carbide, or boron carbide) to form a composite moderator. The second material is dispersed within the matrix of the first material. This composite structure allows the graphite matrix to provide structural stability and resistance to irradiation-induced swelling, while the dispersed second material enhances neutron moderation capability, thereby extending moderator lifetime and maintaining compositional stability under reactor irradiation conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the homogeneous monolithic moderator into a composite structure consisting of a continuous matrix phase (first moderating material) and dispersed particulate phase (second moderating material). This segmentation allows each component to perform its optimal function: the graphite matrix provides structural integrity and swelling resistance, while the dispersed beryllium or boron compounds provide enhanced moderation without suffering from the same irradiation damage mechanisms, thus resolving the contradiction between lifetime and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If high moderating material like graphite is used, then the neutron slowing down power is high, but the material deteriorates structurally before fuel lifetime is reached

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneutron slowing down powerVSAvoidmoderator service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials where graphite (high moderating capability) is combined with beryllium oxide, beryllium carbide, or boron carbide. The graphite matrix maintains high neutron slowing down power, while the dispersed second material particles are more resistant to irradiation-induced structural deterioration. This composite approach allows the system to maintain high productivity in neutron moderation while extending the duration of service life to match or exceed fuel lifetime, resolving the contradiction between moderating performance and service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If monolithic moderator material is used, then the design is simple, but frequent core changes are required generating significant nuclear waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderator design simplicityVSAvoidnuclear waste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials to create a moderator with extended lifetime that can match fuel lifetime, thereby reducing the frequency of core changes and nuclear waste generation. Although the composite structure is more complex than monolithic materials, the long-term benefit of reduced waste and fewer replacements justifies the initial complexity. The composite structure maintains adequate moderating performance while significantly extending service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If graphite is used as moderator, then the moderating ability is good, but graphite oxidation safety issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderating abilityVSAvoidgraphite oxidation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials where graphite is combined with beryllium oxide, beryllium carbide, or boron carbide. The second material serves as an oxidation-resistant component that can protect the graphite matrix from oxidation reactions. This composite approach maintains the excellent moderating ability of graphite while mitigating the harmful oxidation effect, thereby improving safety without sacrificing moderating performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite moderator medium extends nuclear reactor core lifetime, reduces waste generation, and improves safety by maintaining dimensional stability and moderating performance, matching fuel lifetime without the need for frequent replacements, thus offering economic and environmental benefits.

Implementation Method 1

the moderator should be able to slow down neutrons to an acceptable speed. Thus, in an ideal moderator the neutron scattering cross-section is high. This neutron scattering is a measure of how likely a neutron will interact with an atom of the moderator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutron scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

If the collisions between neutrons and nuclei are elastic collisions, it implies that the closer in size the nucleus of an atom is to a neutron, the more the neutron will be slowed.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic collision:

Implementation Method 3

the two or more moderators include a low and a high moderating material, the high moderating material having a higher neutron slowing down power compared to the low moderating material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeutron moderation: Scattering

Implementation Method 4

the low moderating material matrix provides structural stability and resistance to irradiation-induced swelling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIrradiation resistance:

Implementation Method 5

a composite moderator medium for a nuclear reactor core that includes a low moderating material matrix and a high moderating material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP3743926B1Composite moderator for nuclear reactor systems
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 ULTRA SAFE NUCLEAR CORP
  • EP3743926B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3743926B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3743926B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A composite moderator medium for nuclear reactor systems and a method of fabricating a composite moderator block formed of the composite moderator medium The composite moderator medium includes two or more moderators, such as a low moderating material and a high moderating material. The high moderating material has a higher neutron slowing down power compared to the low moderating material. The low moderating material includes a moderating matrix of silicon carbide or magnesium oxide. The high moderating material is dispersed within the moderating matrix and includes beryllium, boron, or a compound thereof. The high moderating material is encapsulated within the low moderating material such that the high moderating material is not exposed outside of the low moderating material. The method can include selecting a sintering aid and a weight percent of the sintering aid in a composite moderator mixture based on the low moderating material and spark plasma sintering.