Composite Construction Element Fabrication via Segmented Moulds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for casting composite construction elements with complex geometries, such as those with over-hanging surfaces, face challenges in mold removal due to the complexity and cost of multi-part molds or consumable molds, which often result in waste and require significant time and energy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-controlled apparatus fabricates a mold with specific receiving portions for objects using 3D modeling and deposition techniques, allowing for the creation of complex geometries and efficient mold removal through meltable or soluble materials, enabling the production of composite construction elements with embedded objects in various geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a complex multi-part mould is used to cast construction elements with over-hanging surfaces, then the mould can be released from the cast element, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemould removalVSAvoidmould complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mould is divided into multiple separable parts that can be detached from the cast element. Each mould part can be independently removed, allowing extraction of cast elements with over-hanging surfaces without requiring complex disassembly mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Release features such as gaps and parting lines are incorporated into the mould design during fabrication. These features are prepared in advance to facilitate mould removal, eliminating the need for complex removal mechanisms during the casting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If a consumable mould is used to cast construction elements with complex geometries, then the mould can be removed by destruction, but the loss of substance and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemould removalVSAvoidmould material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The mould is segmented into multiple reusable parts rather than being a single consumable structure. This allows the mould to be recovered and reused for multiple casting operations, significantly reducing material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mould design incorporates features that enable easy recovery and reuse. Instead of destroying the mould after a single use, the segmented structure allows for complete retrieval and preparation for subsequent casting cycles, reducing both material loss and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If planar mould surfaces are used to cast composite construction elements, then veneer tiles can be easily secured to the mould, but the geometry of the cast element is limited to planar panels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetile securingVSAvoidgeometry versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mould surface is divided into multiple planar segments that can be arranged at different angles and orientations. This segmentation allows the creation of complex three-dimensional geometries while each individual segment maintains the simplicity of a planar surface for easy tile securing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mould transitions from a single planar surface to a multi-dimensional segmented structure. By arranging planar segments in three-dimensional space, the mould can produce cast elements with complex geometries including curves and angles, while each segment retains the ease of planar tile attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If layout mats are used to retain veneer tiles on the mould, then tile arrangement is controlled, but the mats cannot be reliably secured to complex geometry moulds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetile arrangementVSAvoidmould-tile integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The layout mat is divided into multiple smaller sections that can be independently attached to corresponding mould segments. This segmentation allows the mat to conform to complex mould geometries while maintaining the precision of tile arrangement through localized attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The layout mat system transitions from a single planar sheet to a multi-dimensional configuration that follows the segmented mould surface. This allows the mat to be securely attached to complex geometries by distributing attachment across multiple planar segments rather than requiring attachment to a continuous complex surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient and cost-effective fabrication of composite construction elements with complex geometries, reducing waste and energy consumption while allowing for precise control over mold geometry and object placement, facilitating the creation of structures with embedded veneer tiles, bricks, or other materials.

Implementation Method 1

a computer-controlled apparatus fabricates a mould by selectively depositing build material in successive layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D printing (additive manufacturing): 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

introducing settable material into the cavity and at least partially curing the settable material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring (chemical setting): Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

The mould may comprise a meltable or soluble material configured to be destroyed to enable removal of the mould from the cast construction element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

The mould may comprise a meltable or soluble material configured to be destroyed to enable removal of the mould from the cast construction element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Data Source

PatentEP3180173B1Method for fabricating a composite construction element
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 LAING OROURKE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
  • EP3180173B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3180173B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3180173B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for fabricating a composite construction element using a mould fabricated by a computer-controlled apparatus. The method comprises the steps of fabricating the mould having one or more receiving portions dimensioned to receive one or more respective objects responsive to computer instructions relating to the mould geometry, positioning the one or more objects in respective receiving portions, covering at least a portion of the mould and the one or more objects with settable material, and at least partially curing the settable material, thereby forming the composite construction element having the one or more objects embedded therein.