Composite No-Back Brake for Flight Control Wear and Chatter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional no-back brake devices in flight control actuation systems face issues with friction device wear, high-temperature resistance, and chatter, leading to reduced performance and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a bi-directional no-back brake system using a torque tube with a brake mechanism featuring alternating drag-brake and main-brake sections, incorporating composite material friction devices and metallic rotors, which form frictional couplings to prevent rotational motion and withstand high temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional friction devices are used in no-back brake, then braking function is achieved, but friction device wear occurs before desired end of life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidfriction device service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The friction device is made from a composite material comprising a metal matrix and a friction modifier distributed within the metal matrix. The metal matrix provides structural integrity and high-temperature resistance, while the friction modifier (such as graphite, PTFE, or MoS2) reduces wear and maintains stable friction characteristics. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by achieving reliable braking function while extending service life through reduced wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If conventional friction devices are used in no-back brake, then braking function is achieved, but high-temperature resistance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidhigh-temperature resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The composite material structure with metal matrix provides high-temperature resistance while maintaining braking function. The metal matrix (such as aluminum, copper, or steel-based) retains structural stability at elevated temperatures, preventing deformation and maintaining braking effectiveness under thermal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If conventional friction devices are used in no-back brake, then braking function is achieved, but chatter occurs under certain operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidchatter
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The composite material with friction modifier provides stable friction characteristics that prevent chatter. The friction modifier ensures consistent friction force during braking operation, eliminating the oscillatory vibrations known as chatter that can occur with conventional friction materials. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliable braking while eliminating harmful chatter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Duration of action of moving object

If friction device wear is reduced through material improvement, then service life is extended, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction device service lifeVSAvoidfriction device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The composite material approach extends service life through wear reduction while maintaining relatively simple device structure. The composite friction device can be manufactured as a monolithic component or layered structure, avoiding the need for complex multi-component assemblies. This resolves the contradiction by achieving extended service life with minimal increase in structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the service life, reduces wear, improves high-temperature resistance, and minimizes chatter, thereby increasing energy and loading capacities while maintaining effective braking performance.

Implementation Method 1

The friction device is configured to form a frictional coupling between the rotor and the stator that opposes relative rotational motion between the rotor and the stator when the brake is axially displaced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20230322364A1No-back brake for a flight control actuation system and method
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 THE BOEING CO
  • US20230322364A1 patent drawing
  • US20230322364A1 patent drawing
  • US20230322364A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A no-back brake includes a torque tube and a brake. The brake is configured to be axially displaced in response to a force to prevent the torque tube from rotating. The brake includes a rotor that is concentric with the torque tube and that is fixed to the torque tube so that the rotor rotates with the torque tube. The brake includes a stator that is concentrically mounted on the torque tube so that the torque tube is rotatable relative to the stator. The brake includes a friction device located between the rotor and the stator. The friction device is configured to form a frictional coupling between the rotor and the stator that opposes relative rotational motion between the rotor and the stator when the brake is axially displaced. The frictional device includes a composite material.