Composite Panel Manufacturing with Disposable Moulds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The automotive industry faces high costs associated with metal stamping tooling and limited flexibility in producing composite vehicle parts, making it challenging to reduce tooling costs and facilitate the production of vehicles in lower volumes without economies of scale.

Innovation Solution

The Arrival system employs a method of manufacturing composite parts using a shared platform with autonomous robotic manufacturing, which includes preparing a yarn, forming a bespoke fabric, moulding the precursor material into shape, cutting it to size, bonding parts, and assembling vehicles, thereby reducing tooling costs and enabling flexible, cost-effective production of composite parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metal stamping tooling is used to create exterior panels, then production speed and automation are improved, but tooling costs and capital investment increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidtooling cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs disposable or reusable moulds made from composite materials instead of expensive steel stamp tools. These moulds can be manufactured at a fraction of the cost of traditional metal stamping tools (US$5,000/m2 vs US$100,000+), enabling cost-effective production even at lower volumes while maintaining automated manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameters of the tooling itself by using composite materials for mould construction rather than traditional steel. This parameter change reduces the cost, weight, and complexity of the tooling while enabling the same high-speed automated production capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If economies of scale are implemented through huge capital investment and vast factories, then cost per unit decreases, but flexibility and adaptability to market changes are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidproduction flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic production capabilities where manufacturers can quickly adapt production volumes and product designs without the constraints of expensive fixed tooling. The reusable composite moulds allow for easier reconfiguration and adaptation to market changes, providing both cost efficiency and flexibility simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a universal manufacturing approach that can serve multiple production scenarios - from high-volume to low-volume production - using the same composite mould technology. This multi-functional capability eliminates the need for separate tooling systems for different production scales, enhancing both cost efficiency and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If composite materials are used instead of metal stamping, then tooling costs are reduced, but manufacturing complexity and process development increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling costVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite moulds that can be created as copies or replicas of the desired final part geometry, simplifying the manufacturing process. These moulds capture the complex shapes directly without requiring complex metal forming processes, reducing both tooling cost and process complexity while maintaining manufacturing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies and automates the manufacturing of composite parts, reducing production costs and enabling the production of vehicles in lower volumes while maintaining quality and efficiency, allowing for bespoke designs and quick adaptation to market changes.

Implementation Method 1

heating means for heating the composite structure above a melting point of the thermoplastic polymer matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

cooling means for cooling the composite structure below the melting point to form the part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS20220379593A1Composite panels and parts
Publication Date: 2022.12.01 BARKER ROAD TECHNOLOGY LTD
  • US20220379593A1 patent drawing
  • US20220379593A1 patent drawing
  • US20220379593A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed composite structure provides a reinforced thermoplastic polymer composite part with a high-quality surface finish. This may be used as a vehicle part or body panel, such as an interior vehicle part or exterior body panel. Additionally, the surface finish may be coloured, such that the surface does not need to be painted or wrapped to achieve a desired surface colour, and the surface may protect inner layers from UV radiation, either by virtue of the material of the surface itself, or the incorporation of a UV-absorbing additive. Specifically, the disclosed composite structure comprises a structural layer comprising reinforcing fibres, such as glass or carbon fibres, and a thermoplastic body polymer. The structure further comprises a surface layer providing a surface finish to the composite structure, the surface layer comprising a thermoplastic surface polymer substantially free from reinforcing fibres.