Composite Panel Stacking Sequence Optimization via Layout Matrices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing composite panels with variable laminate ply percentages across the panel is challenging due to the complexity of transforming laminate thickness/percentage formulations into stacking sequences that satisfy global ply continuity and local stacking sequence design rules, as conventional methods like genetic algorithms are inefficient in covering the vast design space of possible permutations.

Innovation Solution

The method involves creating layout matrices for each orientation angle to identify zones with specific ply counts, arranging these matrices into candidate sequences, and using a genetic algorithm to select and optimize the sequences, thereby reducing the design space complexity and ensuring global continuity while satisfying local rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional genetic algorithms are used to optimize stacking sequences for each zone independently, then local stacking sequence rules can be satisfied, but the computational complexity becomes intractable due to the vast design space of possible permutations across multiple zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesatisfaction of local stacking sequence rulesVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stacking sequence optimization problem by introducing layout matrices that group zones with identical ply orientation requirements. Instead of treating each zone independently with full permutation freedom, the layout matrices create equivalence classes of zones that can share common stacking sequence patterns, thereby reducing the effective search space while maintaining local rule satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The layout matrices serve as universal templates that can be applied across multiple zones simultaneously. A single layout matrix design can satisfy the stacking sequence requirements for multiple zones with identical orientation needs, making the optimization process more efficient and reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining reliability across all zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of zones and plies per zone increases, then the panel can achieve more complex variable laminate percentages, but the number of possible stacking sequence permutations grows factorially making optimization infeasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable laminate percentage design capabilityVSAvoidnumber of stacking sequence permutations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the panel into zones and further groups zones into layout matrix categories based on their ply orientation requirements. This segmentation transforms the problem from optimizing individual zone stacking sequences to optimizing a smaller set of layout matrix patterns, reducing the factorial growth of permutations while enabling complex variable laminate percentages across the entire panel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optimization parameters from individual zone stacking sequences to layout matrix patterns. By reparameterizing the problem in terms of layout matrices that capture common stacking sequence patterns across multiple zones, the method reduces the effective number of design variables while maintaining the ability to achieve complex variable laminate percentages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If stacking sequence tables with constant laminate ply percentages are used, then global ply continuity and local stacking rules are satisfied, but the method cannot handle variable laminate percentages across different zones of the panel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal ply continuity and local stacking rulesVSAvoidvariable laminate percentage accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing the laminate ply percentages to vary across different zones while maintaining global continuity and local rules. The layout matrix approach enables the stacking sequence design to adapt to zone-specific requirements differentially, transforming the static constant-percentage tables into dynamic variable-percentage solutions that satisfy all constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different zones to have different laminate ply percentages and stacking sequence characteristics tailored to their specific structural requirements. The layout matrices enable each zone to have optimized local properties while maintaining overall panel continuity and rule compliance, thus achieving variable laminate percentages without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8731870B2Method of designing a composite panel
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US8731870B2 patent drawing
  • US8731870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of designing a composite panel, the panel comprising a plurality of zones, each zone comprising a plurality of plies of composite material arranged in a stacking sequence, each ply in each stacking sequence having a respective orientation angle. For each orientation angle a first layout matrix is created which identifies zones in the panel which contain at least one ply with that orientation angle. A second layout matrix is also created which identifies zones in the panel which contain at least two plies with that orientation angle, and so on up to an Nth layout matrix which identifies zones in the panel which contain at least N plies with that orientation angle. The layout matrices are arranged in a plurality of candidate sequences. Selection criteria are then used to choose one or more of the candidate sequences and stacking sequences are assigned to the zones in accordance with the chosen candidate sequence(s).