Composite Parts Production with Support Material Void Filling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing composite parts with complex cross-sections in the aeronautical field are limited, as they either require multiple mandrels or cannot produce parts with overhanging zones, restricting the production of parts with variable geometries and significant mass reduction.

Innovation Solution

An automatic process involving layer-by-layer manufacturing using a combination of filament winding, CAD-driven layer construction, and the use of support materials to maintain the part during production, allowing for the creation of composite parts with complex cross-sections and overhanging zones from a single tool, utilizing a resin matrix and reinforcement materials like carbon or glass fibers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If filament winding is used to manufacture composite parts, then continuous deposition of yarns is achieved, but only parts of revolution with simple geometries can be produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous depositionVSAvoidgeometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into multiple winding phases, each corresponding to a specific geometric zone of the part. The mandrel is divided into sections with different winding parameters, allowing complex cross-sections to be built layer by layer while maintaining continuous deposition productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The winding process employs dynamic adjustment of deposition parameters during rotation. The system can change yarn deposition rate, layer thickness, and winding angle in real-time based on the mandrel's rotational position, enabling complex geometries to be formed continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fabric is wound around a mandrel to produce complex cross-section parts, then complex geometries are achieved, but one mandrel per geometry is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex cross-sectionVSAvoidmandrel variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single universal mandrel design is used for all part geometries. The mandrel incorporates adjustable winding guides and deposition zones that can be reconfigured through software control, eliminating the need for multiple specialized mandrels while maintaining the ability to produce various complex cross-sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mandrel system uses variable winding parameters (speed, tension, deposition rate, layer angle) that can be changed during operation. This allows the same physical mandrel to produce different complex geometries by adjusting process parameters rather than changing the mandrel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional molding processes are used, then parts are produced, but significant mass reduction is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparts productionVSAvoidpart mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses composite materials combining fibers (carbon, glass, aramid) with polymer matrices to create parts that are both lightweight and structurally sound. The layer-by-layer construction allows optimization of fiber orientation and material distribution to achieve maximum strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the part are constructed with different material compositions and fiber orientations based on local structural requirements. This allows mass reduction in non-critical areas while maintaining necessary strength and stiffness in load-bearing zones, optimizing the overall weight-performance balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of composite parts with improved mechanical and thermal characteristics, allowing for direct assembly in applications like aircraft engines, with significant mass reduction and flexibility in producing complex geometries, while maintaining dimensional and mechanical requirements.

Implementation Method 1

the reinforcement is impregnated with a liquid resin by passing it through a bath (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

The impregnated or pre-impregnated reinforcement (22) is completely or partially polymerized to obtain a composite material (20)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentEP2199069B1Production of complex composite pieces
Publication Date: 2014.06.11 TECHSPACE AERO
  • EP2199069B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2199069B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2199069B1 patent drawingFigure 3C~3D

AI summary

The present invention relates to an automated layer-by-layer manufacturing process for a composite part of revolution with a complex cross-section, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: a) A coil (1) or roll comprising a reinforcement is continuously unwound; b) Optionally, the reinforcement is impregnated with a liquid resin by passing it through a bath (2); c) The impregnated reinforcement is wound onto a rotating cylindrical mandrel (4); d) The impregnated reinforcement is completely or partially polymerized to obtain a composite material; e) A support (21) and/or a support material is deposited on either side of the composite material constituting the part being manufactured so as to fill voids surrounding said part.