Automated Composite Patch Fabrication via 3D Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for fabricating composite patches to rework composite structures are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error, leading to inconsistencies in fitment and alignment due to manual measurement and cutting processes.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing under computer control to produce composite laminate rework/repair patches, where a 3-D map of the reworked area is generated and used to produce plies with precise dimensions and orientations, reducing human intervention and enhancing fitment accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual measurement and cutting processes are used to fabricate composite patches, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but manufacturing precision and consistency deteriorate due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatch fitment accuracyVSAvoidmanual labor requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement and cutting processes with automated computer-controlled cutting systems. The control system receives digital design data and automatically controls the cutting tool to fabricate patches with precise dimensions and complex geometries, eliminating human error in measurement and cutting while maintaining the ability to adapt to different repair scenarios through software programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital copying of the original structure's geometry through 3D scanning or CAD models to create accurate digital templates. These digital copies are then used to generate cutting paths and patch designs, ensuring that each patch precisely matches the required geometry without manual measurement errors, while the digital data can be reused consistently across multiple patches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If automated computer-controlled cutting is used to produce patches, then manufacturing precision and consistency are improved, but device complexity and initial setup requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional control accuracyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal computer-controlled cutting system that can handle multiple patch types, geometries, and materials through software programming rather than dedicated equipment for each task. The system uses standardized digital data formats and can be reconfigured for different repair scenarios by loading different design files, reducing the need for multiple specialized devices while maintaining high precision across all applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If hand labor is used to orient and stack patch plies, then process flexibility is maintained, but productivity and consistency deteriorate due to variability in manual operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatch fabrication speedVSAvoidautomation equipment requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual orientation and stacking of patch plies with automated handling systems controlled by computer software. The system automatically positions each ply according to the digital design data, ensuring consistent orientation and alignment without the variability inherent in manual operations, while the software can be programmed to handle different ply sequences and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces human error and improves the consistency and accuracy of patch fitment, enabling precise alignment and installation of patches that match the topography of the reworked area, thereby enhancing the quality and reliability of the rework process.

Implementation Method 1

The rework patch is produced by additive manufacturing, layer-by-layer. The additive manufacturing may be performed by one of 3-D printing, stereolithography, fused deposition modeling, and selective laser sintering.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdditive manufacturing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

Aligning the nanotubes is performed by subjecting the nanotubes to an electromagnetic field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field alignment: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9156240B2Automated production and installation of patches for reworking structures
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 THE BOEING CO
  • US9156240B2 patent drawing
  • US9156240B2 patent drawing
  • US9156240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An area of a composite laminate structure is reworked by scarfing the area, generating a 3-D map of the scarfed area, and installing a rework patch that is built based on the 3-D map.