Composite Ply Stack Analysis for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for designing and manufacturing composite structures do not adequately account for the cumulative effects of imperfections and deviations in ply layers, leading to overdesign, increased weight, and reduced payload capacity in aircraft, which complicates dimensional tolerance and interfacing with other structures.

Innovation Solution

A method using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software to generate and analyze numerically coded tool path definitions for tape or tow courses, evaluating actual ply definitions, and visualizing potential impacts to optimize composite structure design and manufacturing, allowing for concurrent production enhancements and optimization of designs used in various structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If known composite design specifications and methods are used to allow imperfections at the ply level, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but cumulative detrimental effects at the laminate level cannot be evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidcumulative effect information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from analyzing plies in isolation (2D individual ply level) to analyzing the cumulative stack-up effect (3D laminate level). The software program evaluates the stacked arrangement of multiple plies, considering the vertical dimension and interactions between adjacent plies, thereby capturing cumulative detrimental effects that cannot be detected at the individual ply level alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the software program provides evaluation results about cumulative imperfection effects back to the design and manufacturing process. This feedback enables engineers to adjust ply arrangements, gap specifications, or overlap tolerances to avoid detrimental cumulative effects while maintaining manufacturing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If composite structures are overdesigned to compensate for potential flaws, then structural reliability is improved, but weight increases and payload capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural reliabilityVSAvoidcomposite structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by evaluating and identifying potential cumulative detrimental effects during the design phase using the software program. By detecting problematic ply arrangements, gap concentrations, or overlap patterns before manufacturing, engineers can optimize the design to achieve necessary reliability without adding excessive material or overdesigning the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables parameter changes by allowing engineers to modify design parameters such as gap tolerances, overlap specifications, or ply stacking sequences based on the software evaluation results. This optimization process adjusts parameters to achieve the minimum necessary material for reliable structures, avoiding weight penalties from overdesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If gap and overlap distances are reduced to analyze plies as continuous pieces, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidgap and overlap tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by evaluating the actual cumulative effect of gaps and overlaps through software analysis rather than requiring all gaps and overlaps to be minimized uniformly. The software identifies which specific gap or overlap concentrations are detrimental, allowing manufacturers to apply precision only where necessary while maintaining larger tolerances elsewhere, thus balancing structural integrity with manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8108058B2Method of analyzing composite structures
Publication Date: 2012.01.31 THE BOEING CO
  • US8108058B2 patent drawing
  • US8108058B2 patent drawing
  • US8108058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for generating a data product that allows for enhanced design, analysis and manufacture of a composite structure comprising a plurality of plies. The method comprises the steps of obtaining geometric ply definitions, inputting the geometric ply definitions into a computer aided manufacturing (CAM) software program to generate a numerically coded tool path definition containing centerline data for each tape or tow comprising a ply, programming tape or tow course shape definitions of a plurality of plies in CAM to produce actual ply definitions, using CAM to generate an accumulated dataset of actual ply definitions, using a customized software program to analyze the dataset to obtain a data product containing results relating to manufacturing implementation of the actual ply definitions, and using the customized software program to evaluate and visualize potential impact of the data product and to interrogate the data product.