Composite Preform for Aircraft Fuselage Lobe Intersections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wide-body fuselages present structural complexities due to inflections at the top and bottom, requiring novel structural support elements to effectively distribute forces and counter pressure loads, which existing technologies have not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

The use of 3-dimensional woven composite preforms, made from materials like carbon fiber, steel, or aluminum, which are woven to form structural distribution members that are co-cured with the fuselage skin and impregnated with resin to provide enhanced structural support at the intersections of side-by-side fuselage lobes, effectively distributing tensile and compressive loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If traditional tube-and-wing configuration is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but fuel efficiency cannot be further improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuselage is divided into multiple lobes (e.g., three lobes) instead of a single tubular structure. Each lobe can be independently structured and assembled, allowing the wide-body configuration to achieve superior fuel efficiency through increased lift while managing structural complexity through modular segmentation of the fuselage into distinct lobar sections that can be manufactured and integrated separately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials in the construction of the wide-body fuselage lobes and structural components. This allows the complex wide-body structure to achieve the necessary strength and stiffness for fuel efficiency improvements while reducing overall weight, thereby maintaining ease of manufacture despite the increased structural complexity of the multi-lobe configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Use of energy by moving object

If wide-body fuselage is adopted to improve fuel efficiency, then lift is increased and wing size is reduced, but structural complexities arise at inflection points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity at inflections
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local reinforcement and specialized structural features at the inflection points where lobes intersect. These localized structural elements are specifically designed to handle the unique stress concentrations at cusps and intersection points, while the rest of the fuselage lobes maintain a simpler structure. This allows the wide-body configuration to achieve fuel efficiency through increased lift without requiring complex structures throughout the entire fuselage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The inflection points and cusps are pre-reinforced with structural elements during the manufacturing process. The lobes are constructed with built-in structural features at anticipated stress points before assembly, and the intersection regions are pre-configured with reinforcement elements that are integrated during the assembly process, eliminating the need for complex post-assembly modifications at these critical locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If structural reinforcement is added at inflection points, then structural integrity is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidfuselage weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials for structural reinforcement at inflection points and lobe intersections. These composite structures provide the necessary strength and stiffness to maintain structural integrity at critical locations while being significantly lighter than traditional metal reinforcement would be. The composite materials allow for optimized fiber orientation and distribution that targets strength exactly where needed without adding unnecessary weight throughout the entire fuselage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement is applied locally only at the specific inflection points and cusps where structural integrity is critical, rather than uniformly throughout the entire fuselage. This localized reinforcement approach ensures structural strength at stress concentration points while minimizing the overall weight penalty, as the reinforcement materials are placed only where structurally necessary and not in regions where the simple lobe structure already provides adequate strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11332228B2Aircraft fuselage with composite pre-form
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 AURORA FLIGHT SCIENCES CORP
  • US11332228B2 patent drawing
  • US11332228B2 patent drawing
  • US11332228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wide-body aircraft is disclosed with a fuselage section that includes a set of side-by-side fuselage lobes having a fuselage skin. A first woven composite preform positioned at a first intersection of the set of side-by-side fuselage lobes located at a first cusp of the side-by-side fuselage lobes. A second woven composite preform positioned at a second intersection of the set of side-by-side fuselage lobes located at a second cusp of the side-by-side fuselage lobes. Each of the first and second woven composite preforms are configured to receive a structural component, such that each of the first and second woven composite preforms accommodates vertical load imparted through the structural component.