Composite Propeller Hub Rotor Design for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotor designs for rotorcrafts face issues with weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity and efficiency, as they are prone to load-induced degradation, affecting reliability and maintainability.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design featuring a blade retention cuff, a titanium horseshoe-shaped yoke, and a graphite epoxy composite propeller hub, with pin-attached rotor blades that can fold and bearings to manage centrifugal forces, ensuring structural integrity and reduced weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional rotor designs are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but weight is excessive and drag is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve rotor weightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials throughout the rotor structure, including graphite epoxy composite for the hub, titanium for the yoke, and composite laminates for the blades. These materials provide high strength-to-weight ratios, enabling weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity under operational loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the structural parameters by transitioning from conventional solid metal construction to composite materials with optimized fiber orientations. The composite laminates are designed with specific ply arrangements to achieve required strength properties while minimizing weight, representing a fundamental parameter change in the structural approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If conventional rotor designs are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but drag is high and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedragVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thin-walled composite structures for the hub and blades, optimized to provide necessary strength while minimizing cross-sectional area and drag. The aerodynamic surfaces are designed with precise thickness distributions to reduce form drag while maintaining structural adequacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

Composite materials enable streamlined, aerodynamically optimized shapes with high strength-to-weight ratios. The blade and hub geometries are tailored to minimize drag while the composite construction ensures structural integrity, achieving both low drag and high strength simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If weight is reduced in rotor design, then efficiency improves, but reliability degrades due to load handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor efficiencyVSAvoidreliability under load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The composite materials provide high specific strength and stiffness, enabling weight reduction while maintaining or improving load handling capability. The titanium yoke and composite hub are designed to distribute and manage operational loads effectively, ensuring reliability despite reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor structure employs local quality optimization where composite laminates are tailored with specific fiber orientations and thicknesses in different regions to handle local stress patterns. This ensures that each area of the structure has the precise properties needed for its loading conditions, maximizing both efficiency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of repair

If conventional rotor designs are used, then reliability is maintained, but maintainability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaintainabilityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is divided into discrete, modular components including separate blades, hub, and yoke assemblies. This segmentation enables individual components to be inspected, maintained, or replaced independently, improving maintainability while the overall design maintains reliability through proper load path management across component interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a lightweight rotor hub with enhanced reliability and maintainability, capable of withstanding operational loads and improving aircraft efficiency by distributing loads effectively within composite laminates.

Implementation Method 1

an inboard bearing is located in the interior of the yoke configured to restrain centrifugal force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

an outboard bearing comprising a radial element is configured to contact a top-side of the blade retention cuff when the rotor blade is subjected to an upward force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce: Force

Data Source

PatentUS10336444B2Composite stiffened rigid propeller shaped main rotor hub
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US10336444B2 patent drawing
  • US10336444B2 patent drawing
  • US10336444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor includes a blade retention cuff configured to receive a rotor blade; a yoke coupled to the blade retention cuff; and a rigid propeller shaped hub configured to enclose at least a portion of the blade retention cuff and at least a portion of the yoke.