Composite Radius Filler Forming via Strip Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for forming radius fillers for composite structures lack tight control over shape and are labor-intensive, often resulting in voids and mechanical instability in composite structures during curing.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving a sheet-locating structure, separation device, and layup surface to form strips of composite material, which are then compacted and stacked to create a radius filler with precise shape and mechanical support, using a conveyance structure to translate and separate the sheet into strips with controlled width and location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional radius fillers utilize a single length of composite material that is creased and molded, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the shape control is loose and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidshape control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The composite material sheet is divided into multiple parallel strips through automated separation, with each strip contributing to a specific portion of the radius filler shape. This segmentation enables precise control of the final shape while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strips are separated and positioned in advance on the layup surface before the molding process begins. This preliminary arrangement of strips allows for precise shape control to be established before curing, eliminating the need for post-shaping adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional radius fillers utilize manually stacked composite material lengths, then shape adjustment is possible, but the process is labor-intensive and productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape adjustment capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual stacking operations are replaced with an automated separation device that mechanically divides the composite sheet into multiple strips and conveys them to the layup surface. This substitution eliminates labor-intensive manual handling while maintaining the ability to adjust strip configuration for different shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of the number of strips, their spacing, and their positions on the layup surface. This dynamic configurability enables versatile shape adaptation while the automated process maintains high productivity through continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If radius fillers are formed with loose shape control, then manufacturing is easier, but voids and distortion occur during composite structure curing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation simplicityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated separation and conveyance system provides precise control over strip positioning and spacing, ensuring that the radius filler maintains its intended shape throughout the curing process. This precision feedback control eliminates voids and distortion that would otherwise compromise structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The precise shape of the radius filler is established in advance through automated strip arrangement before the composite structure begins curing. This preliminary precision shaping ensures that no voids or distortions develop during the curing process, guaranteeing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If automated strip separation and conveyance is implemented, then shape precision and productivity improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separation device is designed to perform multiple functions: dividing the composite sheet into strips, conveying the strips to the layup surface, and enabling positional adjustments. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate devices for each operation, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9993980B2Methods for forming radius fillers for composite structures
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 THE BOEING CO
  • US9993980B2 patent drawing
  • US9993980B2 patent drawing
  • US9993980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for forming radius fillers for composite structures are disclosed herein. The methods include locating a sheet of composite material on a first support surface and translating the sheet of composite material such that a first portion of the sheet is supported by the first support surface and a second portion of the sheet extends past the support surface edge. The methods also include supporting the second portion of the sheet with a second support surface and separating the second portion of the sheet from the first portion of the sheet to form a strip of composite material. The methods further include conveying the strip of composite material onto a layup surface.