Composite Reinforcement for Box-Type Concrete Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Box-type concrete structures face challenges in resisting shear force and negative moments, particularly at corners, leading to structural safety issues and insufficient earthquake resistance due to the limitations of conventional reinforcement materials and existing seismic reinforcement devices.

Innovation Solution

A composite material reinforcement device integrating a hollow aluminum beam with a prepreg sheet and a trapezoidal cross-section central portion, featuring a reinforcement portion with a first and second plate, extension portions, and a connection member to enhance rigidity and ductility, while being chemically resistant and suitable for installation in vulnerable areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional reinforcement materials (steel plates) are used to reinforce box-type concrete structures, then structural strength can be improved, but the materials cannot be used because they are conductors and concrete fails to increase load-carrying capacity in negative moment sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidload-carrying capacity in negative moment section
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite material consisting of a non-conductive reinforcing material (such as fiber-reinforced polymer) combined with a specific structural configuration (corner reinforcement device with dispersion plates) to simultaneously achieve both strength enhancement and maintained load-carrying capacity in negative moment sections. The composite structure allows strength improvement without the electrical conductivity issues of steel plates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If earthquake-resistant devices are attached to connect ceiling to side wall to disperse external force, then member force is reduced, but resistance force of the member is not increased and earthquake resistance performance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemember forceVSAvoidresistance force of member
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary reinforcement to the corner sections before seismic events occur by installing the corner reinforcement device with dispersion plates that pre-establish enhanced load paths and force distribution mechanisms. This preliminary strengthening ensures that when seismic loads are applied, the structure has already been prepared with increased resistance force, not just force dispersion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If reinforcement device is used to disperse shear force and negative moment at corners, then structural safety is improved, but rigidity and ductility capabilities are not simultaneously improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural safetyVSAvoidrigidity and ductility capabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality enhancement by concentrating the reinforcement device specifically at the corner sections where stress concentrations occur during seismic events. The dispersion plates are strategically positioned at corners to provide localized improvements in rigidity and ductility where they are most needed, rather than uniformly reinforcing the entire structure. This localized approach simultaneously improves structural safety and maintains/enhances rigidity-ductility characteristics at critical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240426125A1Composite material reinforcement device for box-type concrete structure and method of constructing the same
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 KYUNGPOOK NAT UNIV IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND
  • US20240426125A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426125A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite material reinforcement device may include: a central portion including an edge portion provided to have an inner space having a trapezoidal cross-section with reference to a longitudinal direction, and a partition wall portion dividing the inner space into at least one partition space; and a reinforcement portion located on a top and a bottom of the central portion and integrally molded to cover the central portion, wherein the reinforcement portion includes: a first plate located on the top of the central portion to cover an upper portion of the central portion; a second plate curved to correspond to a shape of the central portion and located at the bottom of the central portion to cover a lower portion of the central portion; and an extension portion in which the first plate and the second plate extend from both ends of the central portion to be bonded to each other.