Automated Composite Repair System Using Laser Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for repairing large areas of composite structures, such as aircraft fuselages, are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and require multiple skilled personnel due to the need for extensive engineering analysis and varied engineering tools, making them unsuitable for rapid and repeatable repairs.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates design, analysis, and manufacturing operations to rapidly create and install custom bolted repairs using a laser tracker for precise mapping and automated software for component design and fastener pattern generation, allowing for standardized and optimized repair solutions with reduced dependence on multiple experts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If bonding techniques are used for repairs, then the repair can be effected through simple bonding processes, but the plies are built up beyond normal skin thickness altering the cross sectional profile and the process is not suitable for larger areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of repair processVSAvoidcross sectional profile control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The repair process is divided into distinct phases: mapping the damage area, designing the repair components, fabricating the components, and installing them. This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently, with the mapping phase using laser trackers for precision and the fabrication phase using standardized templates for repeatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses laser tracking to create a digital copy of the damage area and its surrounding features. This digital model is then used to design repair components that precisely fit the damaged area, eliminating the need for repeated manual measurement and ensuring consistent cross-sectional profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If extensive engineering analysis is performed to determine the repair area, then the repair can be precisely designed, but the process becomes time consuming and labor intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair area determination precisionVSAvoidrepair design time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary mapping of the damage area using laser trackers before the actual repair design begins. This preliminary action captures the geometry and location of the damage, stringers, and frames in advance, so that the subsequent design process can proceed more quickly using pre-acquired data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary digital model that serves as a mediator between the physical damage area and the repair design. This digital model, created through laser tracking and point cloud processing, allows engineers to analyze and design repairs without repeatedly measuring the physical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple specialized experts are involved in the repair process, then the repair can be thoroughly analyzed and designed, but the process becomes more complex and requires coordination between multiple personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair analysis thoroughnessVSAvoidengineering tools complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of multiple specialized experts into a single integrated software system. The system combines mapping capabilities, design tools, analysis functions, and fabrication guidance in one unified platform, allowing one operator to perform tasks that previously required coordination between multiple specialists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The repair system is designed as a universal platform that can handle various repair scenarios and structural configurations. The same software tools can be used for different types of damage, different locations on the fuselage, and different repair methodologies, eliminating the need for multiple specialized toolsets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If standardized specifications are used for repair components, then the repair process can be rapid and repeatable, but the design may not be optimized for each specific repair location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair installation speedVSAvoidrepair optimization for specific location
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses locally adapted repair components that are customized for each specific damage location while maintaining standardized design principles. The laser-mapped geometry of each unique damage area is used to create repair components that precisely fit that location, achieving both standardization and customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid, repeatable, and automated large area repairs of composite structures, reducing the need for multiple skilled personnel and improving efficiency by using standardized specifications and previously approved repair templates.

Implementation Method 1

a laser or similar energy beam to select points along the boundaries of the repair area, and determining the 3D location of the selected points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS8209838B2Repairing composite structures
Publication Date: 2012.07.03 THE BOEING CO
  • US8209838B2 patent drawing
  • US8209838B2 patent drawing
  • US8209838B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The design for a repair of an area of a composite structure is at least partially automated. Electronic data defining the boundaries of the area is used to calculate the boundaries of a cutout in the composite structure encompassing the area. Components used to repair the area are automatically designed based on the location of the cutout. Following removal of the cutout, the repair components are installed.