Automated Deposition Apparatus for Composite Rotor Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing wind turbine rotor blades are costly, labor-intensive, and inefficient, with high mold tooling expenses and slow production rates, due to the need for customized molds and low utilization of expensive tooling.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for manufacturing composite components, including rotor blades, using automated deposition technologies like 3-D printing and additive manufacturing, with a mold disposed within a grid and multiple machine heads movable along various axes for efficient material deposition and customization of structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional molding processes with customized molds are used to manufacture rotor blades, then manufacturing precision and structural integrity are improved, but manufacturing cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade structural integrityVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor blade is divided into multiple segments that can be manufactured separately and then assembled. This allows parallel production of multiple segments, significantly increasing productivity while maintaining the precision of individual segment manufacturing through controlled molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Molds are prepared and pre-positioned in advance for each blade segment. This preliminary preparation of tooling enables immediate production when materials are ready, reducing idle time and increasing overall production rate without sacrificing manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If conventional molding processes with customized molds are used to manufacture rotor blades, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing cost increases due to high mold tooling expenses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mold design incorporates universal features that allow the same mold to produce multiple different blade segments or to be easily reconfigured for different production needs. This reduces the number of specialized molds required, lowering overall tooling costs while maintaining the strength and quality of produced components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables recovery and reuse of mold components and tooling fixtures across multiple production cycles and different blade designs. This recovers the high initial mold investment through extended utilization, reducing the effective manufacturing cost per blade while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Strength

If conventional molding processes are used to manufacture rotor blades, then structural components are improved, but tooling utilization is low and costs remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural componentsVSAvoidtooling utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing system maintains continuous operation of molds and tooling through uninterrupted production cycles. Multiple segments are produced in sequence without mold idle time, ensuring that expensive tooling is constantly utilized. This continuous useful action maximizes tooling utilization while producing structurally sound components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Dividing the blade into segments enables continuous production where molds work without interruption, producing one segment after another. This eliminates downtime between different blade productions, maintaining high tooling utilization rates while ensuring each structural component meets strength requirements through consistent manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11548246B2Apparatus for manufacturing composite airfoils
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11548246B2 patent drawing
  • US11548246B2 patent drawing
  • US11548246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to an apparatus for manufacturing a composite component. The apparatus includes a mold onto which the composite component is formed. The mold is disposed within a grid defined by a first axis and a second axis. The apparatus further includes a first frame assembly disposed above the mold, and a plurality of machine heads coupled to the first frame assembly within the grid in an adjacent arrangement along the first axis. At least one of the mold or the plurality of machine heads is moveable along the first axis, the second axis, or both. At least one of the machine heads of the plurality of machine heads is moveable independently of one another along a third axis.