Composite Aircraft Seat Back With Integrally Molded Diaphragm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft seat back manufacturing techniques require a separate and precise application of a tensioned fabric diaphragm over a seat back frame, which is prone to misalignment and does not provide consistent support, and involves multiple parts and assembly steps.

Innovation Solution

Integrally molding a composite seat back diaphragm into a seat back frame during the manufacturing process, using composite materials like carbon fiber, to form a unitary structure that eliminates the need for separate diaphragm application and allows for varied diaphragm positions and contoured support surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a fabric diaphragm is separately manufactured and pulled over the seat back frame, then the seat back can be assembled, but the process is complex and prone to misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidnumber of parts and assembly steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the diaphragm and seat back frame into a single integrated structure by molding the diaphragm directly onto the frame during composite material curing. This eliminates the separate assembly step of pulling the diaphragm over the frame, reducing both manufacturing complexity and the number of discrete parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The diaphragm is pre-positioned and molded onto the seat back frame during the composite manufacturing process itself, before final assembly. This preliminary integration ensures proper alignment and eliminates subsequent assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the diaphragm is pulled over the frame under tension, then proper back support is provided, but precise sizing is difficult and mismatch occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback support consistencyVSAvoiddiaphragm sizing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By molding the diaphragm directly onto the frame as an integrated structure, the patent eliminates sizing mismatches entirely. The diaphragm is custom-formed to match the specific frame geometry, ensuring consistent tension and support without the need for manual sizing adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The molded diaphragm can have varying thickness, tension, and contour characteristics at different locations on the seat back frame, allowing optimized back support in specific areas such as lumbar regions while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If aluminum frame with separate diaphragm is used, then manufacturing is straightforward, but weight is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidseat back weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials (such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers) to manufacture both the frame and diaphragm as a single integrated part. This replaces traditional aluminum construction while significantly reducing weight and eliminating the need for separate diaphragm assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The integration of frame and diaphragm into a single molded composite structure eliminates redundant materials and joint weights, achieving weight reduction beyond what would be possible with simply replacing aluminum with composite materials alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If the diaphragm position is fixed relative to the frame, then assembly is simple, but design flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoiddiaphragm position variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The molded integration allows the diaphragm to be positioned at different locations and orientations relative to the frame depending on design requirements. The single-step molding process accommodates various diaphragm configurations without increasing assembly complexity, enabling dynamic adaptation to different seat back designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8870291B2Integral molded seat back for composite seat frame and method
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • US8870291B2 patent drawing
  • US8870291B2 patent drawing
  • US8870291B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft seat back including a composite material seat back frame element and a composite seat back diaphragm molded to the seat back frame element during a molding step to provide a composite aircraft seat back formed of a seat back frame element and a seat back diaphragm.