Composite Sintered Sliding Member for High-Load Hydraulic Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sliding members with copper-based alloys lack sufficient hardness for high-load environments and abrasion resistance, particularly in hydraulic equipment, and often result in material remnants that increase production costs.

Innovation Solution

A sliding member comprising a first sintered compact layer of iron-based material and a second sintered compact layer of copper-based material, where the second layer is densified through a blast process to achieve a hardness of Hv 150-250, forming a surface with concavities and convexities for improved friction and abrasion resistance, while minimizing material remnants by molding the first layer to match the final product shape.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a copper-based alloy is used for the sliding layer, then low friction is achieved, but hardness is insufficient for high-load environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding characteristicVSAvoidhardness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite structure with an iron-based sintered compact as the base material and a copper-based sintered compact as the sliding layer. This composite structure combines the low friction properties of copper-based materials with the high strength and hardness of iron-based materials, resolving the contradiction between achieving low friction and maintaining sufficient hardness for high-load environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The copper-based sliding layer is applied only to the sliding surface where low friction is needed, while the iron-based base material provides the structural strength and hardness required for high-load conditions. This local differentiation of material properties allows each layer to perform its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If extraction method is used to form the sliding member, then desired shape is achieved, but material remnants are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape accuracyVSAvoidmaterial remnants
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The iron-based sintered compact is molded into the final product shape before the copper-based sliding layer is applied. This preliminary shaping action eliminates the need for subsequent extraction processes, preventing material remnants from being generated while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If the second sintered compact layer is not densified, then manufacturing is simpler, but hardness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidhardness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies a blast process to change the density parameter of the copper-based sintered compact layer. By increasing the density through this impact process, the hardness of the sliding layer is enhanced to meet high-load requirements while maintaining the overall simplicity of the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a sliding member with enhanced hardness and abrasion resistance suitable for high-load applications, reduces material usage and costs by eliminating or minimizing remnants, and maintains low friction through an oil film reservoir on the surface.

Implementation Method 1

The second sintered compact layer is densified by an impact process wherein the powder is collided against one surface of the second sintered compact layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact process: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

a first sintered compact layer formed by molding and sintering first metallic powder; and a second sintered compact layer formed on one surface of the first sintered compact layer by molding and sintering second metallic powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS9956613B2Sliding member and production method for same
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 SENJU METAL IND CO LTD
  • US9956613B2 patent drawing
  • US9956613B2 patent drawing
  • US9956613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sliding member having a hardness proper for an environment where a high-pressure is applied and having a good abrasion resistance. A sliding member 1 comprises a first sintered compact layer 2 formed by solidifying an iron-based metallic powder with a sinter; and a second sintered compact layer 3 formed by solidifying a copper-based metallic powder on a surface of the first sintered compact layer 2 to improve a sliding characteristic. The second sintered compact layer 3 is densified by a blast process where the powder is collided against a surface of the second sintered compact layer 3.